Ice streams deposit sediment at their grounding lines, where ice reaches flotation. Grounding Zone Wedge (GZW) deposits indicate standstills in past grounding-line retreat, and are thought to stabilize grounding lines by reducing local water depth, restricting ice flow. However, the mechanisms of GZW growth are uncertain, as are the effects of sedimentation on a retreating grounding-line prior to GZW formation. We develop a 1-D coupled model of ice flow and sediment transport, considering both subglacial deposition of deforming sediments, and proglacial melt-out of entrained sediments from ice shelves. A refined grid near the grounding line resolves small sediment features and their effect on ice dynamics. The model simulates the growth of low-profile, prograding, asymmetric features consistent with observed GZWs. We find that the characteristic shape of GZWs arises from the coupling of sedimentation and ice dynamics. This mechanism is consistent with deposition from either deforming or entrained sediments, and does not require a low-profile ice shelf to limit vertical GZW growth. We also find that during grounding-line retreat, sedimentation provides a stabilizing feedback when other factors initially slow retreat. This may turn a slowdown in retreat into a long standstill, even when ice dynamics are far out of equilibrium. The feedback depends on total sediment flux and its spatial pattern of deposition, making these priorities for future study. Our study suggests that sedimentation might significantly extend pauses in deglaciation, and the model provides a new tool for exploring links between ice-stream dynamics and submarine landforms.

Denis Felikson

and 3 more

The projected contribution to sea-level rise from the Greenland Ice Sheet currently has a large spread in literature, ranging from about 14 to 255 mm by the year 2100. Part of this spread is due to uncertainty in mass loss from ocean-terminating outlet glaciers in response to terminus retreat. Here, we use a diffusive-kinematic wave formulation of glacier thinning to show that steep bed features can limit thinning from diffusing inland from a glacier’s terminus. This simplified model allows us to rank 141 of Greenland’s outlet glaciers based on their potential to allow thinning to diffuse far inland and, thus, contribute to sea-level rise over the next century. We then target two glaciers: Kakivfaat Sermiat (KAK) in West Greenland and Kangerlussuaq Gletscher (KLG) in East Greenland. Both glaciers have a high potential to contribute to sea-level rise but with contrasting bed geometries; KAK has relatively low ice flux but its geometry can allow thinning to diffuse far inland while KLG has high ice flux but a geometry that will limit thinning to 30 km inland of its terminus. We simulate mass loss from each glacier, in response to prescribed terminus retreat, using a higher-order numerical model, and find very different response times of mass loss from the two glaciers over the next century. KLG reaches a new steady state by 2100, while the slow inland diffusion of thinning causes KAK to continue its response into the next century and beyond. As a result, KAK contributes nearly twice the volume of ice to sea-level rise of KLG by year 2200, suggesting that low-flux glaciers that can allow thinning to spread far into the ice sheet interior may contribute much to sea-level rise as high-flux glaciers that limit thinning to their lowest reaches. By identifying the glaciers around the ice sheet with the highest potential to contribute to sea-level rise, we hope to help focus future higher-order numerical modeling studies working toward narrowing the range in sea-level rise projections.