Missing climate feedbacks in fire models: limitations and uncertainties
in fuel loadings and the role of decomposition in fine fuel succession
Abstract
In recent decades, climate change has lengthened wildfire seasons
globally and doubled the annual area burned. Thus, capturing fire
dynamics is critical for projecting Earth system processes in warmer,
drier, more fire prone future. Recent advances in fire regime modeling
have linked land surface and Earth system models with fire behavior
models. Such models often rely on fine surface fuels to drive fire
spread, and while many models can simulate processes that control how
these fuels change through time (i.e., fine fuel succession), fuel
loading estimates remain highly uncertain. Uncertainties are amplified
in climate change forecasts when initial conditions and feedbacks are
not well represented. The goal of this review is to highlight fine fuel
succession as a key uncertainty in model systems. We review the current
understanding of mechanisms controlling fine fuel succession (with an
emphasis on decomposition), describe how these mechanisms are
incorporated into models, and evaluate the strengths and uncertainties
associated with different approaches. We also use three state-of-the-art
fire regime models to demonstrate the sensitivity of decomposition
projections to both parameter and model structure uncertainty and show
that sensitivity increases dramatically under future climate warming.
Given that many of the governing decomposition equations are hard-coded
in models and often based on individual case studies, substantial
uncertainties are currently ignored. To understand future
climate-fuel-fire feedbacks, it is essential to be transparent about
model choices and uncertainty. This is particularly critical as the
domain of Earth system models is expanded to include evaluation of
future wildfire regimes.