Synoptic weather systems are a major driver of spatial gradients in atmospheric CO2 mole fractions. During frontal passages, air masses from different regions meet at the frontal boundary creating significant gradients in CO2 mole fractions. We quantitatively describe the atmospheric transport of CO2 mole fractions during a mid-latitude cold front passage and explore the impact of various sources of CO2. We focus here on a cold front passage over Lincoln, Nebraska on August 4th, 2016 observed by aircraft during the Atmospheric Carbon and Transport (ACT)-America campaign. A band of air with elevated CO2was located along the frontal boundary. Observed and simulated differences in CO2 across the front were as high as 25 ppm. Numerical simulations using WRF-Chem at cloud resolving resolutions (3km), coupled with CO2 surface fluxes and boundary conditions from CarbonTracker (CT-NRTv2017x), were performed to explore atmospheric transport at the front. Model results demonstrate that the frontal CO2 difference in the upper troposphere can be explained largely by inflow from outside of North America. This difference is modified in the atmospheric boundary layer and lower troposphere by continental surface fluxes, dominated in this case by biogenic and fossil fuel fluxes. Horizontal and vertical advection are found to be responsible for the transport of CO2 mole fractions along the frontal boundary. We show that cold front passages lead to large CO2 transport events including a significant contribution from vertical advection, and that mid-continent frontal boundaries are formed from a complex mixture of CO2 sources.

We present observations of local enhancements in carbon dioxide (CO2) from local emissions sources over three eastern US regions during four deployments of the Atmospheric Carbon Transport-America (ACT-America) campaign between summer 2016 and spring 2018. Local CO2 emissions were characterized by carbon monoxide (CO) to CO2 enhancement ratios (i.e. ΔCO/ΔCO2) in airmass mixing observed during aircraft transects within the atmospheric boundary layer. By analyzing regional-scale variability of CO2 enhancements as a function of ΔCO/ΔCO2 enhancement ratios, observed relative contributions to CO2 emissions were contrasted between different combustion regimes across regions and seasons. Ninety percent of observed summer combustion in all regions was attributed to high efficiency fossil fuel (FF) combustion (ΔCO/ΔCO2 < 0.5%). In other seasons, regional contributions increased from less efficient forms of FF combustion (ΔCO/ΔCO2 0.5-2%) to as much as 60% of observed combustion. CO2 emission contributions attributed to biomass burning (BB) (ΔCO/ΔCO2 > 4%) were negligible during summer and fall in all regions, but climbed to 10-12% of observed combustion in the South during winter and spring. Vulcan v3 CO2 2015 emission analysis showed increases in residential and commercial sectors seasonally matching increases in less efficient FF combustion, but could not explain regional trends. WRF-Chem modeling, driven by CarbonTracker CO2 fire emissions, matched observed winter and spring BB contributions, but conflictingly predicted similar levels of BB during fall. Satellite fire data from MODIS and VIIRS suggested higher spatial resolution fire data might improve modeled BB emissions.