loading page

Above or Below the Moho? Contentious Earthquakes in the Southern East African Rift
  • +1
  • Kimberly Espinal,
  • Shiqi (Axel) Wang,
  • Brian Chen,
  • Simon Klemperer
Kimberly Espinal
Stanford University, Stanford University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Shiqi (Axel) Wang
Stanford University, Stanford University
Author Profile
Brian Chen
Stanford University, Stanford University
Author Profile
Simon Klemperer
Stanford University, Stanford University
Author Profile

Abstract

We studied seven earthquakes in the southern East African Rift System (EARS) with catalog depths of 10 to 33km, in locations where the Moho is thought to be at ~32 km depth (CRUST 1.0). Our earthquakes include three relocated by Yang and Chen (JGR, 2010) to be significantly deeper and to be below the Moho. We independently assessed whether the events occurred above or below the Moho using the Sn/Lg method (Wang et al., AGU Fall Meeting 2019; see also adjacent poster by Chen et al.). In a 1D earth, sub-Moho earthquakes produce strong Sn and weak Lg signals, and intra-crustal earthquakes produce weak Sn and strong Lg arrivals. All seven events we studied were characterized by low Sn/Lg, including the three earthquakes interpreted as upper-mantle events by Yang and Chen (2010) (their events M3 and M5 in Malawi and T12 in Zambia). Although low Sn/Lg is elsewhere associated with crustal events we suspect that, in the East African Rift, events in the shallow upper mantle that produce strong Sn at the source may be recorded at regional distances with low Sn/Lg due to Sn-to-Lg conversion at the deepening Moho at the rift margins. CRUST 1.0 suggests crustal thicknesses reach 45 km beneath the cratons adjacent to the East African Rift, with average Moho dips of 5-10°. Hence even the deepest earthquake reported by Yang and Chen (JGR, 2010), at 44±4 km, could undergo significant Sn-to-Lg conversion. Our findings highlight the importance of careful interpretation of Sn/Lg ratios and motivates our ongoing work to model 2D propagation effects.