loading page

Trees talk tremor - Wood anatomy and δ13C content reveal contrasting tree-growth responses to earthquakes
  • +3
  • Christian H. Mohr,
  • Michael Manga,
  • Gerhard Helle,
  • Ingo Heinrich,
  • Laura Giese,
  • Oliver Korup
Christian H. Mohr
University of Potsdam

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Michael Manga
University of California, Berkeley
Author Profile
Gerhard Helle
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam
Author Profile
Ingo Heinrich
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam
Author Profile
Laura Giese
German Federal Institute of Hydrology
Author Profile
Oliver Korup
University of Potsdam
Author Profile

Abstract

Moderate to large earthquakes can increase the amount of water feeding stream flows, raise groundwater levels, and thus grant plant roots more access to water in water-limited environments. We examine tree growth and photosynthetic responses to the Maule Mw 8.8 Earthquake in small headwater catchments of Chile’s Mediterranean Coastal Range. We combine high-resolution wood anatomic (lumen area) and biogeochemical ( of wood cellulose) proxies of daily to weekly tree growth on cores sampled from trees on floodplains and close to ridge lines. We find that, immediately after the earthquake, at least two out of six tree cores show changes in these proxies: lumen area increased and decreased in the valley trees, whereas the sign of change was reversed in trees on the hillslope. Our results indicate a control of soil water on this response, largely consistent with models that predict how enhanced post-seismic vertical soil permeability causes groundwater levels to rise on the valley floor, but fall along the ridges. Statistical analysis with boosted regression trees indicates that streamflow discharge gained predictive importance for photosynthetic activity on the ridges but lost importance on the valley floor after the earthquake. We infer that earthquakes may stimulate ecohydrological conditions favoring tree growth over days to weeks by triggering stomatal opening. The weak and short-lived signals that we identified, however, show that such responses are only valid under water-limited instead of energy-limited tree growth. Hence, dendrochronological studies targeted at annual resolution may overlook some earthquake effects on tree vitality.
Oct 2021Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences volume 126 issue 10. 10.1029/2021JG006385