Abstract
Increased access to genome-wide data provides new opportunities for
plant conservation. However, information on neutral genetic diversity in
a small number of marker loci can still be valuable because genomic data
are not available to most rare plant species. In the hope of bridging
the gap between conservation science and practice, we outline how
conservation practitioners can more efficiently employ population
genetic information in plant conservation. We first review the current
knowledge about the within-population genetic variation and
among-population differentiation in neutral genetic variation (NGV) and
adaptive genetic variation (AGV) in seed plants. We then introduce the
estimates of among-population genetic differentiation in quantitative
traits (QST) and neutral markers
(FST) to plant biology and summarize conservation
applications derived from
QST–FST comparisons,
particularly on how to capture most AGV and NGV on both in-situ and
ex-situ programs. Based on a review of published studies, we found that,
on average, two and four populations would be needed for woody
perennials (n = 18) to capture 99% of neutral and adaptive
genetic variation, respectively, whereas four populations would be
needed in case of herbaceous perennials (n = 14). On average,
QST is about 3.6, 1.5, and 1.1 times greater than
FST in woody plants, annuals, and herbaceous
perennials, respectively. We suggest using maximum
QST rather than average
QST among trait comparisons. Hence, conservation
and management policies or suggestions based solely on inference on
FST could be misleading, particularly in woody
species. We recommend conservation managers and practitioners consider
this when formulating further conservation and restoration plans for
plant species, and for woody species in particular.