Abstract
Global use of reactive nitrogen (N) has increased over the past century
to meet growing food and biofuel demand, while contributing to
substantial environmental impacts. To project future N inputs for crop
production, many studies assumed that Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)
remains the same as the current level under a Business-As-Usual (BAU)
scenario. This assumption ignores potential NUE changes caused by
shifting crop mixes and the diminishing return of yield increase to N
inputs at a given level of technology and management practices (TMP). To
evaluate the impacts of these two factors on the projection of future N
inputs, we developed and tested three approaches, namely “Same NUE”,
“Same TMP”, and “Improving TMP”. We found that the approach
considering the diminishing returns in yield response (“Same TMP”)
resulted in 268 Tg N yr-1 of N inputs which were 61 and 48 Tg N yr-1
higher when keeping NUE at the current level with and without
considering crop mix, respectively. If TMP is assumed to continue to
evolve at the pace of past five decades, the projected N inputs reduce
to 204 Tg N yr-1, but still 59 Tg N yr-1 higher than the inputs in the
baseline year 2006. Overall, our results suggest that the BAU approach
that assumes constant NUE may be too optimistic in projecting N inputs,
and the full range of projection assumptions need to be carefully
explored when investigating future N budgets.