loading page

Mapping the spatial footprint of sea breeze winds in the southeastern United States.
  • +6
  • Shaowu Bao,
  • Lenard J. Pietrafesa,
  • Paul T Gayes,
  • Stephen R Noble,
  • Brian Viner,
  • Jian-Hua Qian,
  • David Werth,
  • Grant Mitchell,
  • Savannah Burdette
Shaowu Bao
Coastal Carolina University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Lenard J. Pietrafesa
Burroughs & Chapin Scholar, Coastal Carolina University
Author Profile
Paul T Gayes
Coastal Carolina University
Author Profile
Stephen R Noble
Savannah River National Laboratory
Author Profile
Brian Viner
Savannah River National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile
Jian-Hua Qian
Savannah River National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile
David Werth
Savannah River National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile
Grant Mitchell
Coastal Carolina University
Author Profile
Savannah Burdette
Coastal Carolina University
Author Profile

Abstract

Sea breeze winds are observed at various locations worldwide, but the spatially continuous mapping of sea breeze winds is rare. We have developed a scheme to map the areas of the southeastern United States (US) coast influenced by sea breeze winds using a range of surface re-analysis data to identify their occurrence. Changes in wind direction and dew point temperature are both used to detect a potential sea breeze signature, which is then confirmed by cumuliform clouds seen in satellite images or coastal fronts shown as cohesive lines in radar reflectivity images. Filters are employed to remove onshore winds not induced by the temperature difference between land and sea.
From March to September 2019, this scheme identified 134 days with sea breeze occurrence somewhere in the southeastern US, a frequency of 63 percent. The number of sea breezes increased from March to July and then decreased to September. Deep inland propagation of sea breezes during this period left footprints in a band parallel to the coastline up to about 220 km inland, after which the sea breeze winds quickly diminished. Comparisons show that the findings using the scheme are consistent with site observations, theoretical estimates, and idealized and semi-idealized numerical model simulations.