loading page

Understanding Biases in E3SMv2 Simulated Cloud Droplet Number and Aerosol Concentrations over the Southern Ocean
  • +4
  • Litai Kang,
  • Roger T Marchand,
  • Po-Lun Ma,
  • Meng Huang,
  • Robert Wood,
  • Ursula Jongebloed,
  • Becky Alexander
Litai Kang
University of Washington

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Roger T Marchand
University of Washington
Author Profile
Po-Lun Ma
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile
Meng Huang
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Author Profile
Robert Wood
University of Washington
Author Profile
Ursula Jongebloed
University of Washington
Author Profile
Becky Alexander
University of Washington
Author Profile

Abstract

The accurate representation of cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is crucial for predicting future climate. However, models often underestimate Nd over the Southern Ocean (SO), where natural sources dominate, and aerosols are composed primarily of marine biogenic sulfate and sea spray. This study uses a range of diverse datasets to evaluate and untangle biases in E3SMv2 simulated clouds, aerosols, and sulfur species. The default E3SMv2 underestimates Nd over SO by a factor of 2 when compared with observations in 3km-resolution simulations. Updating the dimethyl sulfide (DMS) emission and chemistry leads to a better agreement between the model and the observations in Nd and boundary layer aerosols, but low biases persist in the free tropospheric aerosol concentrations larger than 70 nm, possibly attributable to insufficient particle growth. Preliminary evaluation also reveals biases in simulated sulfur species, including overestimation in DMS at high latitudes, and in simulated sulfate mass concentration, highlighting the necessity for further efforts to improve the model treatment of relevant processes.
04 Sep 2024Submitted to ESS Open Archive
07 Sep 2024Published in ESS Open Archive