Juno was inserted into a highly elliptic, polar, orbit about Jupiter on July 4th 2016. Juno’s magnetic field investigation acquires vector measurements of the Jovian magnetic field using a flux gate magnetometer co-located with attitude-sensing star cameras on an optical bench. The optical bench is placed on a boom at the outer extremity of one of Juno’s three solar arrays. The Magnetic Field investigation (MAG) uses measurements of the optical bench inertial attitude provided by the micro Advanced Stellar Compass (µASC) to render accurate vector measurements of the planetary magnetic field. During periJoves, MAG orientation is determined using the spacecraft (SC) attitude combined with transformations between SC and MAG. Substantial pre-launch efforts were expended to maximize the thermal and mechanical stability of the Juno solar arrays and MAG boom. Nevertheless, flight experience demonstrated that the transformation between SC and MAG reference frames varied significantly in response to spacecraft thermal excursions associated with large attitude maneuvers and proximate encounters with Jupiter. This response is monitored by comparing attitudes provided by the MAG investigation’s four CHU’s and the spacecraft attitude. These attitude disturbances are caused by the thermo-elastic flexure of the Juno solar array in response to temperature excursions associated with maneuvers and heating during close passages of Jupiter. In this paper, we investigate these thermal effects and propose a model for compensation of the MAG boom flexure effect.

The micro Advanced Stellar Compass (µASC), an attitude reference for the Juno Magnetic Field investigation, also continuously monitors high energy particle fluxes in Jupiter’s magnetosphere. The µASC camera head unit (CHU) shielding is sufficient to stop electrons with energy <15MeV. By recording the number of particles that penetrate µASC CHU shielding and deposit energy in the CCD sensor, the µASC functions as an energetic particle sensor with a detection threshold well above that of the Juno Energetic Particle Detector Instrument (JEDI) flown for that purpose. Radiation data gathered by the µASC is used to monitor the radiation environment of Jupiter and mapping of the trapped high energy particles. Comparison of the particle population around Jupiter with individual perijove particle observations reveals disturbances when Juno is traversing Ganymede’s M-shell. We present highly energetic electrons interaction with Ganymede’s magnetic field, magnitude and extend of the particle depletion associated with the Ganymede interaction.

In this study, we use data from the Juno and Galileo spacecraft to analyze the internal magnetic dynamo of Ganymede. As the only known moon with a strong internal magnetic field, Ganymede is a uniquely interesting object in the context of understanding the formation and structure of planetary magnetospheres. Using a spherical harmonic model centered on the moon, we report a dipole approximation for Ganymede of g01 = -716.4 nT, g11 = 56.0 nT, and h11 = 27.0 nT. We find that using a quadrupole fit rather than a dipole fit provides only a marginal increase in accuracy, and instead favor the use of a dipole approximation until more data can be obtained. The magnetic moment estimates provided here can be used as a baseline for interpreting data from future spacecraft flybys of the moon, and can serve as inputs into numerical models studying Ganymede’s magnetosphere.

Observations of energetic charged particles associated with Io’s footprint (IFP) tail, and likely within or very near the Main Alfvén Wing, during Juno’s 12th perijove (PJ) crossing show evidence of intense proton acceleration by wave-particle heating. Measurements made by Juno/JEDI reveal proton characteristics that include pitch angle distributions concentrated along the upward loss cone, broad energy distributions that span ~50 keV to 1 MeV, highly structured temporal/spatial variations in the particle intensities, and energy fluxes as high as ~100 mW/m2. Simultaneous measurements of the plasma waves and magnetic field suggest the presence of ion cyclotron waves and transverse Alfvénic fluctuations. We interpret the proton observations as upgoing conics likely accelerated via resonant interactions with ion cyclotron waves. These observations represent the first measurements of ion conics associated with moon-magnetosphere interactions, suggesting energetic ion acceleration plays a more important role in the IFP tail region than previously considered.

Auroral brightness and color ratio imagery, captured using the Juno mission’s Ultraviolet Spectrograph, display intense emissions poleward of Jupiter’s northern main emission, and these are split into two distinctly different spectral or “color ratio” regimes. The most poleward region, designated the “swirl region” by Grodent et al. (2003), exhibits a high color ratio, while low color ratio emissions are found within the collar around the swirl region but still poleward of the main emission. We confirm the apparent strong magnetospheric local time control within the polar collar (Grodent et al., 2003), with the dusk side bright “active region” emissions extending from ~11 to 22 hr of magnetospheric local time. These bright emissions dim by at least an order of magnitude between ~0 and 11 hr magnetospheric local time, in the midnight to dawn side “dark region”. This magnetospheric local time structure holds true even when the entire northern oval is located on the night side of the planet (in ionospheric local time), a geometry unstudied prior to Juno, as it is unobservable from Earth. The swirl region brightens at ionospheric dawn (~5-7 ionospheric local time) and diminishes or completely disappears at ionospheric local times of ~20 to 22 hrs. Finally, the southern auroral polar emissions appear to share all of the local time dependencies of its northern counterpart, but at a reduced intensity.

The Juno spacecraft’s polar orbits have enabled direct sampling of Jupiter’s low-altitude auroral field lines. While various datasets have identified unique features over Jupiter’s main aurora, they are yet to be analyzed altogether to determine how they can be reconciled and fit into the bigger picture of Jupiter’s auroral generation mechanisms. Jupiter’s main aurora has been classified into distinct “zones”, based on repeatable signatures found in energetic electron and proton spectra. We combine fields, particles, and plasma wave datasets to analyze Zone-I and Zone-II, which are suggested to carry the upward and downward field-aligned currents, respectively. We find Zone-I to have well-defined boundaries across all datasets. H+ and/or H3+ cyclotron waves are commonly observed in Zone-I in the presence of energetic upward H+ beams and downward energetic electron beams. Zone-II, on the other hand, does not have a clear poleward boundary with the polar cap, and its signatures are more sporadic. Large-amplitude solitary waves, which are reminiscent of those ubiquitous in Earth’s downward current region, are a key feature of Zone-II. Alfvénic fluctuations are most prominent in the diffuse aurora and are repeatedly found to diminish in Zone-I and Zone-II, likely due to dissipation, at higher altitudes, to energize auroral electrons. Finally, we identify sharp and well-defined electron density depletions, by up to two orders of magnitude, in Zone-I, and discuss their important implications for the development of parallel potentials, Alfvénic dissipation, and radio wave generation.