Thunder CATS, Ho! Exploring the scientific utility of combined
spaceborne lidar and lightning observations of thunderstorms
Abstract
We will report on the first systematic comparison between global optical
lightning measurements and backscatter lidar observations of cloud
properties. The results suggest that lidar observations can provide
significant insight into the global thunderstorm climatology and also
enable new methods for quality control of spaceborne optical lightning
observations. The International Space Station Lightning Imaging Sensor
(ISS LIS) has been observing thunderstorms between +/-55° latitude since
March 2017. During the first ~8 months of the mission
the Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS) lidar was co-located with LIS
on the ISS. CATS provided vertical profiles of cloud and aerosol
properties along a nadir curtain. For thunderstorms, CATS observations
enabled retrieval of cloud-top height, the presence of liquid water vs.
ice, and other important cloud properties that are relevant to the
production of lightning. Through systematic comparison of ISS LIS and
CATS granules, over 8000 LIS-detected flashes were matched with nearby
coincident CATS profiles between 1 March and 30 October 2017. All of
these flashes’ centroids were within 25 km of the CATS laser’s ground
track. Two-dimensional histograms of cloud-top height and latitude show
consistency with the expected global behavior of thunderstorm height –
namely, that storm heights are constrained by the tropopause, which
slopes downward toward the poles. The observed CATS/LIS trend was found
to be consistent with long-term March-October thunderstorm 20-dBZ
echo-top height climatologies derived from the Tropical Rainfall
Measuring Mission (TRMM) and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM)
mission (the latter combined with Worldwide Lightning Location Network
data). However, the radar-based climatologies indicate that 20-dBZ echo
tops average ~2 km lower in altitude compared to
lidar-inferred cloud tops. The CATS lidar also enabled identification of
potential LIS false alarms (FAs). Additional analyses, including
lidar-inferred ice-cloud properties in thunderstorms (e.g., ice-water
content), will be presented. Overall, this pathfinder study with a
limited ~8-month dataset suggests that fruitful
scientific insights may be expected from potentially larger combined
lidar/lightning datasets.