Figure 1: Two pregnant syngnathids, a pipefish (Syngnathus abaster ) and a seahorse (Hippocampus guttulatus ; photo by Patrick Louisy).
Even though viviparity has evolved more than 150 times in vertebrates (Whittington, Griffith, Qi, Thompson, & Wilson, 2015), most of our knowledge on the necessary immune system adjustments derives from the mammals’ female pregnancy. Here, immunological tolerance to semi-allogenic embryos is achieved by the downregulation of both major histocompatibility complex pathways (MHC I and II). So, what evolutionary solutions emerged with syngnathid male pregnancy? Recently, Roth et al. (2020) showed, by reconstructing the immune gene repertoire of syngnathid genomes, that the evolution of syngnathid pregnancy coincided with adjustments to the adaptive immune system. In seahorses (genus Hippocampus ) and pipefish (of the genusSyngnathus ), both comprising species with a closed brood pouch (where the risk of embryo rejection would be theoretically higher), several genomic modifications of the MHC II pathway were uncovered, involving either loss or modifications of strategic genes. Even though the precise rearrangement of the MHC II pathway differed between the two types of studied brood pouches, the end result is similar and indicative of selection for lower immunological vigilance during the evolution of pregnancy. Moreover, by analysing the expression of immune and pregnancy genes in reproductive tissues, Roth et al. (2020) found considerable overlap between male and female pregnancy, suggestive of a process of convergent evolution.
The work of Parker et al. (2022), while seemingly flowing from the leading-edge findings of Small, Harlin-Cognato, and Jones (2013), Whittington et al. (2015) and Roth et al. (2020), introduced some relevant methodological upgrades. To fully understand a dynamic process such as pregnancy, where a myriad of cryptic mechanisms occur in orderly succession, one needs to go beyond a couple of snapshots. Thus, Parker et al. (2022) not only extended the inner brood surface tissue gene expression analyses to four species, thus further solidifying the validity of their results, but they also contrasted gene expression at different pregnancy stages (nonpregnant, early, late and parturition), in three distinct brooding architectures (external egg brooding surface, inverted brood pouch, and sealed brood pouch; Figure 2).