In vivo and in silico screening for antimicrobial compounds from
cyanobacteria
- Selina Lenz,
- Dorina Strieth,
- Roland Ulber
Abstract
Due to the emerging rise of multi-drug resistant bacteria, the discovery
of novel antibiotics is of high scientific interest. Through their high
chemodiversity of bioactive secondary metabolites, cyanobacteria have
proven to be promising microorganisms for the discovery of antibacterial
compounds. These aspects make appropriate antibacterial screening
approaches for cyanobacteria crucial. Up to date, screenings are mostly
carried out using a phenotypic methodology, consisting of cyanobacterial
cultivation, extraction, and inhibitory assays. However, the parameters
of these methods highly vary within the literature. Therefore, the
common choices of parameters and inhibitory assays are summarized in
this review. Nevertheless, less frequently used method variants are
highlighted, which lead to hits from antimicrobial compounds. In
addition to the considerations of phenotypic methods, this review
provides an overview of developments in the genome-based screening area,
be it in-vivo using PCR technique or in-silico using the recent
genome-mining method. Though, up to date these techniques are a lot less
applied than phenotypical screening.15 Sep 2021Submitted to MicrobiologyOpen 17 Sep 2021Submission Checks Completed
17 Sep 2021Assigned to Editor
20 Sep 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
09 Oct 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
15 Oct 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
08 Dec 20211st Revision Received
08 Dec 2021Assigned to Editor
08 Dec 2021Submission Checks Completed
08 Dec 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
08 Dec 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
11 Jan 2022Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
31 Jan 20222nd Revision Received
01 Feb 2022Submission Checks Completed
01 Feb 2022Assigned to Editor
01 Feb 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
02 Feb 2022Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
03 Feb 20223rd Revision Received
03 Feb 2022Submission Checks Completed
03 Feb 2022Assigned to Editor
03 Feb 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Feb 2022Editorial Decision: Accept