Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in research activity worldwide. The Vall d’Hebron University Hospital Research Ethics Committee (VH-REC) adapted its procedures to give out the opinion rapidly. We aimed to describe the characteristics of the VH-REC activity and studies evaluated during the first outbreak. Methods: Clinical trials (CT), post-authorization studies (PAS) and research projects (RP) on COVID-19 were included and followed up. Variables were described through usual descriptive methods. Results: 157 studies were evaluated: 10 CT, 16 PAS and 131 RP, in 25 bi-weekly online meetings. Non-commercial, unicentric and national studies predominated (95%, 54% and 88%, respectively). The main objective of CT and PAS studies was to test efficacy and safety, and for RP to describe patients’ outcomes. Some studies focused on specific interest groups, such as healthcare professionals or immunosuppressed patients (10% both). The median time of protocols’ evaluation was 3 days. 58.6% (92) required further clarifications, mainly due to aspects of data protection, informed consent, and biological samples. The final opinion was favourable in 93% (146). Regarding follow-up, 123 studies had been initiated and 64 also finalized. Results have been published in 59% (51) of studies. Conclusions and implications: COVID-19 pandemic has led to greater academic and local research, especially through research projects. Electronic sources were implemented for evaluation shortening and ease follow-up. These measures should remain to streamline VH-REC processes, and trends to publish results favoured. This study could allow comparisons with other activity periods (e.g. pre or post-pandemic), or with other REC’

Aim: The association between COVID-19 disease severity and certain medicines for the treatment of chronic diseases is currently under discussion. We herein evaluated if previous exposure to antihypertensive, hypoglycaemic, and lipid-lowering drugs increases the risk of poorer COVID-19 outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on three cohorts of COVID-19 adult patients between March 2020 and May 2020 at the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. Information relating to the patient lifestyle, comorbidities, and chronic exposures was retrieved from primary healthcare electronic records. Three cohorts were examined, namely patients who had died or required intensive care treatment (ICU/Death [ICU-D] Cohort), patients who required hospitalisation (Hospitalisation [HOSP] Cohort), and patients who only attended the emergency department (Emergencies [EM] Cohort). Descriptive statistics and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to investigate associations with drug exposure, where EM was employed as the reference cohort. Results: We included 1,778 patients: 417 (23.5%) from the ICU-D Cohort, 1,052 (59.2%) from the HOSP Cohort, and 309 (17.4%) from the EM Cohort. After multiple imputations and data adjustment by potential confounders, no statistically significant association was observed between the COVID-19 severity and the use of antihypertensives, hypoglycaemic agents, or lipid-lowering agents, with the exception of calcium channel blockers (CCB) (ICU-D Cohort: OR 2.23; CI 95% [1.03–4.83]; P = 0.042). Conclusions: Most results on lifestyle characteristics and comorbidities related to COVID-19 severity were in agreement with current knowledge, although some associated factors are nowadays a matter of controversy and further investigation is required.