Modeling of protein complexes in CASP14 with emphasis on the interaction
interface prediction
- Justas Dapkunas,
- Kliment Olechnovič,
- Česlovas Venclovas
Abstract
The goal of CASP experiments is to monitor the progress in the protein
structure prediction field. During the 14th CASP edition we aimed to
test our capabilities of predicting structures of protein complexes. Our
protocol for modeling protein assemblies included both template-based
modeling and free docking. Structural templates were identified using
sensitive sequence-based searches. If sequence-based searches failed, we
performed structure-based template searches using selected CASP server
models. In the absence of reliable templates we applied free docking
starting from monomers generated by CASP servers. We evaluated and
ranked models of protein complexes using an improved version of protein
structure quality assessment method, VoroMQA, taking into account both
interaction interface and global structure scores. If reliable templates
could be identified, generally accurate models of protein assemblies
were generated with the exception of an antibody-antigen interaction.
The success of free docking mainly depended on the accuracy of initial
subunit models and on the scoring of docking solutions. To put our
overall results in perspective, we analyzed our performance in the
context of other CASP groups. Although the subunits in our assembly
models often were not of the top quality, these models had, overall, the
best predicted interfaces according to several protein-protein interface
accuracy measures. Since we did not use co-evolution-based prediction of
inter-chain contacts, we attribute our relative success in predicting
interfaces primarily to the emphasis on the interaction interface when
modeling and scoring.01 May 2021Submitted to PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 03 May 2021Submission Checks Completed
03 May 2021Assigned to Editor
03 May 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
18 May 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
19 May 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
31 May 20211st Revision Received
02 Jun 2021Submission Checks Completed
02 Jun 2021Assigned to Editor
02 Jun 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
16 Jun 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
17 Jun 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
21 Jun 20212nd Revision Received
23 Jun 2021Submission Checks Completed
23 Jun 2021Assigned to Editor
23 Jun 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
23 Jun 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
Dec 2021Published in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics volume 89 issue 12 on pages 1834-1843. 10.1002/prot.26167