References
Aizpurua O, Budinski I, Georgiakakis P et al. (2017) Agriculture shapes the trophic niche of a bat preying on multiple pest arthropods across Europe: evidence from DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology.
Alberdi A, Aizpurua O, Gilbert MTP, Bohmann K (2018) Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples. Methods in ecology and evolution / British Ecological Society.
Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Cordonier A, Straub F et al. (2017) Taxonomy-free molecular diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring. Molecular ecology resources, 17, 1231–1242.
Aylagas E, Borja Á, Muxika I, Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N (2018) Adapting metabarcoding-based benthic biomonitoring into routine marine ecological status assessment networks.Ecological indicators, 95, 194–202.
Bakker J, Wangensteen OS, Chapman DD et al. (2017) Environmental DNA reveals tropical shark diversity in contrasting levels of anthropogenic impact.Scientific reports, 7, 16886.
Berry TE, Osterrieder SK, Murray DC et al. (2017) DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea). Ecology and evolution, 7, 5435–5453.
Bessey C, Jarman SN, Berry Oet al. (2020) Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding.Environmental DNA.
Binladen J, Gilbert MTP, Bollback JP et al. (2007) The use of coded PCR primers enables high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PloS one, 2, e197.
Bista I, Carvalho GR, Walsh Ket al. (2017) Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity.Nature communications, 8, 14087.
Blackman RC, Mächler E, Altermatt F et al. (2019) Advancing the use of molecular methods for routine freshwater macroinvertebrate biomonitoring – the need for calibration experiments. Metabarcoding Metagenom., 3, 49–57.
Bohan DA, Vacher C, Tamaddoni-Nezhad A et al. (2017) Next-Generation Global Biomonitoring: Large-scale, Automated Reconstruction of Ecological Networks. Trends in ecology & evolution, 32, 477–487.
Bohmann K, Gopalakrishnan S, Nielsen M et al. (2018) Using DNA metabarcoding for simultaneous inference of common vampire bat diet and population structure.Molecular ecology resources.
Bohmann K, Monadjem A, Lehmkuhl Noer C et al. (2011) Molecular diet analysis of two african free-tailed bats (molossidae) using high throughput sequencing.PloS one, 6, e21441.
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JAet al. (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical chemistry, 55, 611–622.
Calvignac-Spencer S, Merkel K, Kutzner N et al. (2013) Carrion fly-derived DNA as a tool for comprehensive and cost-effective assessment of mammalian biodiversity.Molecular ecology, 22, 915–924.
Carøe C, Bohmann K (2020) Tagsteady: A metabarcoding library preparation protocol to avoid false assignment of sequences to samples. Molecular ecology resources,20, 1620–1631.
Clarke LJ, Czechowski P, Soubrier J (2014a) Modular tagging of amplicons using a single PCR for high‐throughput sequencing. Molecular ecology.
Clarke LJ, Soubrier J, Weyrich LS, Cooper A (2014b) Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias. Molecular ecology resources, 14, 1160–1170.
Coghlan ML, Haile J, Houston J et al. (2012) Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained within traditional Chinese medicines reveals legality issues and health safety concerns. PLoS genetics, 8, e1002657.
Coissac E (2012) OligoTag: a program for designing sets of tags for next-generation sequencing of multiplexed samples. Methods in molecular biology , 888, 13–31.
Cooper A, Poinar HN (2000) Ancient DNA: Do It Right or Not at All. Science, 289, 1139–1139.
Costello M, Fleharty M, Abreu J et al. (2018) Characterization and remediation of sample index swaps by non-redundant dual indexing on massively parallel sequencing platforms. BMC genomics, 19, 332.
Creer S, Deiner K, Frey Set al. (2016) The ecologist’s field guide to sequence-based identification of biodiversity. Methods in ecology and evolution / British Ecological Society, 7, 1008–1018.
Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2014) DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Biology letters,10.
De Barba M, Miquel C, Boyer Fet al. (2014) DNA metabarcoding multiplexing and validation of data accuracy for diet assessment: application to omnivorous diet.Molecular ecology resources, 14, 306–323.
Drinkwater R, Schnell IB, Bohmann K et al. (2018) Using metabarcoding to compare the suitability of two blood-feeding leech species for sampling mammalian diversity in North Borneo. Molecular ecology resources.
Drummond AJ, Newcomb RD, Buckley TR et al. (2015) Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment. GigaScience, 4, 46.
Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics , 27, 2194–2200.
Elbrecht V, Leese F (2015) Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol. PloS one, 10, e0130324.
Elbrecht V, Steinke D (2018) Scaling up DNA metabarcoding for freshwater macrozoobenthos monitoring.Freshwater biology, 5, 1.
Elbrecht V, Vamos EE, Meissner K, Aroviita J, Leese F (2017) Assessing strengths and weaknesses of DNA metabarcoding-based macroinvertebrate identification for routine stream monitoring. Methods in ecology and evolution / British Ecological Society, 8, 1265–1275.
Esling P, Lejzerowicz F, Pawlowski J (2015) Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic acids research,43, 2513–2524.
Fonseca VG, Nichols B, Lallias D et al. (2012) Sample richness and genetic diversity as drivers of chimera formation in nSSU metagenetic analyses. Nucleic acids research, 40, e66.
Galan M, Pons J-B, Tournayre O et al. (2017) Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of several hundred predators and their prey: Application to bat species diet analysis. Molecular ecology resources.
Gous A, Swanevelder DZH, Eardley CD, Willows-Munro S (2019) Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection.Evolutionary applications, 12, 187–197.
Grealy A, Douglass K, Haile Jet al. (2016) Tropical ancient DNA from bulk archaeological fish bone reveals the subsistence practices of a historic coastal community in southwest Madagascar. Journal of archaeological science,75, 82–88.
Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AMet al. (2011) Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome research,21, 494–504.
Hardy N, Berry T, Kelaher BPet al. (2017) Assessing the trophic ecology of top predators across a recolonisation frontier using DNA metabarcoding of diets.Marine ecology progress series, 573, 237–254.
Hibert F, Taberlet P, Chave Jet al. (2013) Unveiling the diet of elusive rainforest herbivores in next generation sequencing era? The tapir as a case study. PloS one, 8, e60799.
Hope PR, Bohmann K, Gilbert MTP et al. (2014) Second generation sequencing and morphological faecal analysis reveal unexpected foraging behaviour by Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in winter. Frontiers in zoology,11, 39.
Jarman SN, Berry O, Bunce M (2018) The value of environmental DNA biobanking for long-term biomonitoring. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 1192–1193.
Ji Y, Baker CCM, Popescu VDet al. (2020) Measuring protected-area outcomes with leech iDNA: large-scale quantification of vertebrate biodiversity in Ailaoshan reserve. BioRXiv, 2020.02.10.941336.
Judo MS, Wedel AB, Wilson C (1998) Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination.Nucleic acids research, 26, 1819–1825.
Kaunisto KM, Roslin T, Sääksjärvi IE, Vesterinen EJ (2017) Pellets of proof: First glimpse of the dietary composition of adult odonates as revealed by metabarcoding of feces. Ecology and evolution, 7, 8588–8598.
Kircher M, Sawyer S, Meyer M (2012) Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic acids research, 40, e3.
Kitson JJN, Hahn C, Sands RJet al. (2018) Detecting host-parasitoid interactions in an invasive Lepidopteran using nested tagging DNA metabarcoding.Molecular ecology.
Kocher A, de Thoisy B, Catzeflis F et al. (2017) Evaluation of short mitochondrial metabarcodes for the identification of Amazonian mammals (O Gaggiotti, Ed,). Methods in ecology and evolution / British Ecological Society, 8, 1276–1283.
Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Applied and environmental microbiology, 79, 5112–5120.
Leray M, Knowlton N (2017) Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding. PeerJ, 5, e3006.
Li J, Hatton‐Ellis TW, Lawson Handley L et al. (2019) Ground‐truthing of a fish‐based environmental DNA metabarcoding method for assessing the quality of lakes. The Journal of applied ecology, 56, 1232–1244.
Li F, Peng Y, Fang W et al. (2018) Application of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Predicting Anthropogenic Pollution in Rivers. Environmental science & technology, 52, 11708–11719.
Lucas A, Bodger O, Brosi BJet al. (2018) Floral resource partitioning by individuals within generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding.Scientific reports, 8, 5133.
Lynggaard C, Yu DW, Oliveira G et al. (2020) DNA-based arthropod diversity assessment in amazonian iron mine lands show ecological succession towards undisturbed reference sites. Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 8.
Meyerhans A, Vartanian JP, Wain-Hobson S (1990) DNA recombination during PCR. Nucleic acids research, 18, 1687–1691.
Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga Tet al. (2015) MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. Royal Society open science,2, 150088.
Murray DC, Coghlan ML, Bunce M (2015) From benchtop to desktop: important considerations when designing amplicon sequencing workflows. PloS one, 10, e0124671.
Nelson MC, Morrison HG, Benjamino J, Grim SL, Graf J (2014) Analysis, optimization and verification of Illumina-generated 16S rRNA gene amplicon surveys.PloS one, 9, e94249.
O’Donnell JL, Kelly RP, Lowell NC, Port JA (2016) Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies. PloS one,11, e0148698.
van Orsouw NJ, Hogers RCJ, Janssen A et al. (2007) Complexity Reduction of Polymorphic Sequences (CRoPSTM): A Novel Approach for Large-Scale Polymorphism Discovery in Complex Genomes. PloS one, 2, e1172.
Owens GL, Todesco M, Drummond EBM, Yeaman S, Rieseberg LH (2018) A novel post hoc method for detecting index switching finds no evidence for increased switching on the Illumina HiSeq X. Molecular ecology resources, 18, 169–175.
Pääbo S, Poinar H, Serre Det al. (2004) Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annual review of genetics, 38, 645–679.
Palkopoulou E, Baca M, Abramson NI et al. (2016) Synchronous genetic turnovers across Western Eurasia in Late Pleistocene collared lemmings. Global change biology, 22, 1710–1721.
Piñol J, Mir G, Gomez-Polo P, Agustí N (2015) Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods. Molecular ecology resources, 15, 819–830.
Pochon X, Bott NJ, Smith KF, Wood SA (2013) Evaluating detection limits of next-generation sequencing for the surveillance and monitoring of international marine pests.PloS one, 8, e73935.
Polz MF, Cavanaugh CM (1998) Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Applied and environmental microbiology, 64, 3724–3730.
Pont D, Rocle M, Valentini Aet al. (2018) Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation.Scientific reports, 8, 10361.
Pont D, Valentini A, Rocle Met al. (2021) The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches. Journal of fish biology, 98, 354–366.
Quéméré E, Hibert F, Miquel Cet al. (2013) A DNA metabarcoding study of a primate dietary diversity and plasticity across its entire fragmented range. PloS one, 8, e58971.
Razgour O, Clare EL, Zeale MRK et al. (2011) High-throughput sequencing offers insight into mechanisms of resource partitioning in cryptic bat species.Ecology and evolution, 1, 556–570.
Rodgers TW, Xu CCY, Giacalone J (2017) Carrion fly‐derived DNA metabarcoding is an effective tool for mammal surveys: Evidence from a known tropical mammal community.Molecular ecology.
Schnell IB, Bohmann K, Gilbert MTP (2015) Tag jumps illuminated–reducing sequence-to-sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies. Molecular ecology resources, 15, 1289–1303.
Schnell IB, Bohmann K, Schultze SE et al. (2018) Debugging diversity-a pan-continental exploration of the potential of terrestrial blood-feeding leeches as a vertebrate monitoring tool. Molecular ecology resources.
Seersholm FV, Cole TL, Grealy A et al. (2018) Subsistence practices, past biodiversity, and anthropogenic impacts revealed by New Zealand-wide ancient DNA survey.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
Seymour M, Edwards FK, Cosby BJ et al. (2020) Executing multi-taxa eDNA ecological assessment via traditional metrics and interactive networks. The Science of the total environment, 729, 138801.
Shehzad W, McCarthy TM, Pompanon F et al. (2012a) Prey preference of snow leopard (Panthera uncia) in South Gobi, Mongolia. PloS one, 7, e32104.
Shehzad W, Riaz T, Nawaz MAet al. (2012b) Carnivore diet analysis based on next-generation sequencing: application to the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Pakistan. Molecular ecology, 21, 1951–1965.
Shin S, Lee TK, Han JM, Park J (2014) Regional effects on chimera formation in 454 pyrosequenced amplicons from a mock community. Journal of microbiology ,52, 566–573.
Sickel W, Ankenbrand MJ, Grimmer G et al. (2015) Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach.BMC ecology, 15, 20.
Sigsgaard EE, Nielsen IB, Carl H et al. (2017) Seawater environmental DNA reflects seasonality of a coastal fish community. Marine biology,164, 128.
Singer G, Fahner NA, Barnes J, McCarthy A, Hajibabaei M (2019) Comprehensive biodiversity analysis via ultra-deep patterned flow cell technology: a case study of eDNA metabarcoding seawater. bioRxiv, 515890.
Sinha R, Stanley G, Gulati GSet al. (2017) Index Switching Causes “Spreading-Of-Signal” Among Multiplexed Samples In Illumina HiSeq 4000 DNA Sequencing.bioRxiv, 125724.
Smyth RP, Schlub TE, Grimm Aet al. (2010) Reducing chimera formation during PCR amplification to ensure accurate genotyping. Gene, 469, 45–51.
Srivathsan A, Sha J, Vogler AP, Meier R (2015) Comparing the effectiveness of metagenomics and metabarcoding for diet analysis of a leaf-feeding monkey (Pygathrix nemaeus). Molecular ecology resources, 15, 250–261.
Stat M, Huggett MJ, Bernasconi R et al. (2017) Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment.Scientific reports, 7, 12240.
Stoeck T, Pan H, Dully V, Forster D, Jung T (2018) Towards an eDNA metabarcode-based performance indicator for full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants.Water research, 144, 322–331.
Swift JF, Lance RF, Guan Xet al. (2018) Multifaceted DNA metabarcoding: Validation of a noninvasive, next-generation approach to studying bat populations.Evolutionary applications, 12, 2175.
Taberlet P, Bonin A, Zinger L, Coissac E (2018) Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research and Monitoring. Oxford University Press.
Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH (2012a) Environmental DNA. Molecular ecology, 21, 1789–1793.
Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E (2012b) Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology, 21, 2045–2050.
Tang M, Hardman CJ, Ji Yet al. (2015) High-throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods in ecology and evolution / British Ecological Society, 6, 1034–1043.
Thomsen PF, Møller PR, Sigsgaard EE et al. (2016) Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.PloS one, 11, e0165252.
Thomsen PF, Sigsgaard EE (2019) Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse communities of terrestrial arthropods. Ecology and evolution.
Valk T van der, van der Valk T, Vezzi F et al. (2019) Index hopping on the Illumina HiseqX platform and its consequences for ancient DNA studies.
de Vere N, Jones LE, Gilmore T et al. (2017) Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability.Scientific reports, 7, 42838.
Vesterinen EJ, Puisto AIE, Blomberg AS, Lilley TM (2018) Table for five, please: Dietary partitioning in boreal bats. Ecology and evolution, 8, 10914–10937.
Vodak D, Lorenz S, Nakken Set al. (2018) Sample-Index Misassignment Impacts Tumor Exome Sequencing.
Wang GC, Wang Y (1997) Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes.Applied and environmental microbiology, 63, 4645–4650.
Yang C, Bohmann K, Wang Xet al. (2021) Biodiversity Soup II: A bulk‐sample metabarcoding pipeline emphasizing error reduction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution.
Zepeda Mendoza ML, Bohmann K, Carmona Baez A, Gilbert MTP (2016) DAMe: a toolkit for the initial processing of datasets with PCR replicates of double-tagged amplicons for DNA metabarcoding analyses. BMC research notes, 9, 255.
Zhang GK, Chain FJJ, Abbott CL, Cristescu ME (2018) Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities.Evolutionary applications, 11, 1901–1914.
Zizka VMA, Elbrecht V, Macher J-N, Leese F (2019) Assessing the influence of sample tagging and library preparation on DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology resources.
Zizka VMA, Geiger MF, Leese F (2020) DNA metabarcoding of stream invertebrates reveals spatio-temporal variation but consistent status class assessments in a natural and urban river. Ecological indicators, 115, 106383.