References
Aizpurua O, Budinski I,
Georgiakakis P et al. (2017) Agriculture shapes the trophic niche
of a bat preying on multiple pest arthropods across Europe: evidence
from DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology.
Alberdi A, Aizpurua O,
Gilbert MTP, Bohmann K (2018) Scrutinizing key steps for reliable
metabarcoding of environmental samples. Methods in ecology and
evolution / British Ecological Society.
Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L,
Cordonier A, Straub F et al. (2017) Taxonomy-free molecular
diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring. Molecular
ecology resources, 17, 1231–1242.
Aylagas E, Borja Á, Muxika I,
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N (2018) Adapting metabarcoding-based benthic
biomonitoring into routine marine ecological status assessment networks.Ecological indicators, 95, 194–202.
Bakker J, Wangensteen OS,
Chapman DD et al. (2017) Environmental DNA reveals tropical shark
diversity in contrasting levels of anthropogenic impact.Scientific reports, 7, 16886.
Berry TE, Osterrieder SK,
Murray DC et al. (2017) DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and
biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion
(Neophoca cinerea). Ecology and evolution, 7,
5435–5453.
Bessey C, Jarman SN, Berry Oet al. (2020) Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding.Environmental DNA.
Binladen J, Gilbert MTP,
Bollback JP et al. (2007) The use of coded PCR primers enables
high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by
454 parallel sequencing. PloS one, 2, e197.
Bista I, Carvalho GR, Walsh Ket al. (2017) Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals
ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity.Nature communications, 8, 14087.
Blackman RC, Mächler E,
Altermatt F et al. (2019) Advancing the use of molecular methods
for routine freshwater macroinvertebrate biomonitoring – the need for
calibration experiments. Metabarcoding Metagenom., 3,
49–57.
Bohan DA, Vacher C,
Tamaddoni-Nezhad A et al. (2017) Next-Generation Global
Biomonitoring: Large-scale, Automated Reconstruction of Ecological
Networks. Trends in ecology & evolution, 32, 477–487.
Bohmann K, Gopalakrishnan S,
Nielsen M et al. (2018) Using DNA metabarcoding for simultaneous
inference of common vampire bat diet and population structure.Molecular ecology resources.
Bohmann K, Monadjem A,
Lehmkuhl Noer C et al. (2011) Molecular diet analysis of two
african free-tailed bats (molossidae) using high throughput sequencing.PloS one, 6, e21441.
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JAet al. (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for
publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical
chemistry, 55, 611–622.
Calvignac-Spencer S, Merkel
K, Kutzner N et al. (2013) Carrion fly-derived DNA as a tool for
comprehensive and cost-effective assessment of mammalian biodiversity.Molecular ecology, 22, 915–924.
Carøe C, Bohmann K (2020)
Tagsteady: A metabarcoding library preparation protocol to avoid false
assignment of sequences to samples. Molecular ecology resources,20, 1620–1631.
Clarke LJ, Czechowski P,
Soubrier J (2014a) Modular tagging of amplicons using a single PCR for
high‐throughput sequencing. Molecular ecology.
Clarke LJ, Soubrier J,
Weyrich LS, Cooper A (2014b) Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in
silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias. Molecular ecology
resources, 14, 1160–1170.
Coghlan ML, Haile J, Houston
J et al. (2012) Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained
within traditional Chinese medicines reveals legality issues and health
safety concerns. PLoS genetics, 8, e1002657.
Coissac E (2012) OligoTag: a
program for designing sets of tags for next-generation sequencing of
multiplexed samples. Methods in molecular biology , 888,
13–31.
Cooper A, Poinar HN (2000)
Ancient DNA: Do It Right or Not at All. Science, 289,
1139–1139.
Costello M, Fleharty M, Abreu
J et al. (2018) Characterization and remediation of sample index
swaps by non-redundant dual indexing on massively parallel sequencing
platforms. BMC genomics, 19, 332.
Creer S, Deiner K, Frey Set al. (2016) The ecologist’s field guide to sequence-based
identification of biodiversity. Methods in ecology and evolution /
British Ecological Society, 7, 1008–1018.
Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac
E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2014) DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c
oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Biology letters,10.
De Barba M, Miquel C, Boyer Fet al. (2014) DNA metabarcoding multiplexing and validation of
data accuracy for diet assessment: application to omnivorous diet.Molecular ecology resources, 14, 306–323.
Drinkwater R, Schnell IB,
Bohmann K et al. (2018) Using metabarcoding to compare the
suitability of two blood-feeding leech species for sampling mammalian
diversity in North Borneo. Molecular ecology resources.
Drummond AJ, Newcomb RD,
Buckley TR et al. (2015) Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA
approach for biodiversity assessment. GigaScience, 4,
46.
Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente
JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of
chimera detection. Bioinformatics , 27, 2194–2200.
Elbrecht V, Leese F (2015)
Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing
Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative
Metabarcoding Protocol. PloS one, 10, e0130324.
Elbrecht V, Steinke D (2018)
Scaling up DNA metabarcoding for freshwater macrozoobenthos monitoring.Freshwater biology, 5, 1.
Elbrecht V, Vamos EE,
Meissner K, Aroviita J, Leese F (2017) Assessing strengths and
weaknesses of DNA metabarcoding-based macroinvertebrate identification
for routine stream monitoring. Methods in ecology and evolution /
British Ecological Society, 8, 1265–1275.
Esling P, Lejzerowicz F,
Pawlowski J (2015) Accurate multiplexing and filtering for
high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic acids research,43, 2513–2524.
Fonseca VG, Nichols B,
Lallias D et al. (2012) Sample richness and genetic diversity as
drivers of chimera formation in nSSU metagenetic analyses. Nucleic
acids research, 40, e66.
Galan M, Pons J-B, Tournayre
O et al. (2017) Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of
several hundred predators and their prey: Application to bat species
diet analysis. Molecular ecology resources.
Gous A, Swanevelder DZH,
Eardley CD, Willows-Munro S (2019) Plant–pollinator interactions over
time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection.Evolutionary applications, 12, 187–197.
Grealy A, Douglass K, Haile Jet al. (2016) Tropical ancient DNA from bulk archaeological fish
bone reveals the subsistence practices of a historic coastal community
in southwest Madagascar. Journal of archaeological science,75, 82–88.
Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AMet al. (2011) Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection
in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome research,21, 494–504.
Hardy N, Berry T, Kelaher BPet al. (2017) Assessing the trophic ecology of top predators
across a recolonisation frontier using DNA metabarcoding of diets.Marine ecology progress series, 573, 237–254.
Hibert F, Taberlet P, Chave Jet al. (2013) Unveiling the diet of elusive rainforest herbivores
in next generation sequencing era? The tapir as a case study. PloS
one, 8, e60799.
Hope PR, Bohmann K, Gilbert
MTP et al. (2014) Second generation sequencing and morphological
faecal analysis reveal unexpected foraging behaviour by Myotis nattereri
(Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in winter. Frontiers in zoology,11, 39.
Jarman SN, Berry O, Bunce M
(2018) The value of environmental DNA biobanking for long-term
biomonitoring. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2,
1192–1193.
Ji Y, Baker CCM, Popescu VDet al. (2020) Measuring protected-area outcomes with leech iDNA:
large-scale quantification of vertebrate biodiversity in Ailaoshan
reserve. BioRXiv, 2020.02.10.941336.
Judo MS, Wedel AB, Wilson C
(1998) Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination.Nucleic acids research, 26, 1819–1825.
Kaunisto KM, Roslin T,
Sääksjärvi IE, Vesterinen EJ (2017) Pellets of proof: First glimpse of
the dietary composition of adult odonates as revealed by metabarcoding
of feces. Ecology and evolution, 7, 8588–8598.
Kircher M, Sawyer S, Meyer M
(2012) Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on
the Illumina platform. Nucleic acids research, 40, e3.
Kitson JJN, Hahn C, Sands RJet al. (2018) Detecting host-parasitoid interactions in an
invasive Lepidopteran using nested tagging DNA metabarcoding.Molecular ecology.
Kocher A, de Thoisy B,
Catzeflis F et al. (2017) Evaluation of short mitochondrial
metabarcodes for the identification of Amazonian mammals (O Gaggiotti,
Ed,). Methods in ecology and evolution / British Ecological
Society, 8, 1276–1283.
Kozich JJ, Westcott SL,
Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD (2013) Development of a dual-index
sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon
sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Applied
and environmental microbiology, 79, 5112–5120.
Leray M, Knowlton N (2017)
Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs
in Illumina COI metabarcoding. PeerJ, 5, e3006.
Li J, Hatton‐Ellis TW, Lawson
Handley L et al. (2019) Ground‐truthing of a fish‐based
environmental DNA metabarcoding method for assessing the quality of
lakes. The Journal of applied ecology, 56, 1232–1244.
Li F, Peng Y, Fang W et
al. (2018) Application of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for
Predicting Anthropogenic Pollution in Rivers. Environmental
science & technology, 52, 11708–11719.
Lucas A, Bodger O, Brosi BJet al. (2018) Floral resource partitioning by individuals within
generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding.Scientific reports, 8, 5133.
Lynggaard C, Yu DW, Oliveira
G et al. (2020) DNA-based arthropod diversity assessment in
amazonian iron mine lands show ecological succession towards undisturbed
reference sites. Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 8.
Meyerhans A, Vartanian JP,
Wain-Hobson S (1990) DNA recombination during PCR. Nucleic acids
research, 18, 1687–1691.
Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga Tet al. (2015) MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for
metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230
subtropical marine species. Royal Society open science,2, 150088.
Murray DC, Coghlan ML, Bunce
M (2015) From benchtop to desktop: important considerations when
designing amplicon sequencing workflows. PloS one, 10,
e0124671.
Nelson MC, Morrison HG,
Benjamino J, Grim SL, Graf J (2014) Analysis, optimization and
verification of Illumina-generated 16S rRNA gene amplicon surveys.PloS one, 9, e94249.
O’Donnell JL, Kelly RP,
Lowell NC, Port JA (2016) Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific
Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies. PloS one,11, e0148698.
van Orsouw NJ, Hogers RCJ,
Janssen A et al. (2007) Complexity Reduction of Polymorphic
Sequences (CRoPSTM): A Novel Approach for Large-Scale
Polymorphism Discovery in Complex Genomes. PloS one, 2,
e1172.
Owens GL, Todesco M, Drummond
EBM, Yeaman S, Rieseberg LH (2018) A novel post hoc method for detecting
index switching finds no evidence for increased switching on the
Illumina HiSeq X. Molecular ecology resources, 18,
169–175.
Pääbo S, Poinar H, Serre Det al. (2004) Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annual
review of genetics, 38, 645–679.
Palkopoulou E, Baca M,
Abramson NI et al. (2016) Synchronous genetic turnovers across
Western Eurasia in Late Pleistocene collared lemmings. Global
change biology, 22, 1710–1721.
Piñol J, Mir G, Gomez-Polo P,
Agustí N (2015) Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use
of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of
arthropods. Molecular ecology resources, 15, 819–830.
Pochon X, Bott NJ, Smith KF,
Wood SA (2013) Evaluating detection limits of next-generation sequencing
for the surveillance and monitoring of international marine pests.PloS one, 8, e73935.
Polz MF, Cavanaugh CM (1998)
Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Applied
and environmental microbiology, 64, 3724–3730.
Pont D, Rocle M, Valentini Aet al. (2018) Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of
fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation.Scientific reports, 8, 10361.
Pont D, Valentini A, Rocle Met al. (2021) The future of fish-based ecological assessment of
European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant
methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches. Journal of fish
biology, 98, 354–366.
Quéméré E, Hibert F, Miquel Cet al. (2013) A DNA metabarcoding study of a primate dietary
diversity and plasticity across its entire fragmented range. PloS
one, 8, e58971.
Razgour O, Clare EL, Zeale
MRK et al. (2011) High-throughput sequencing offers insight into
mechanisms of resource partitioning in cryptic bat species.Ecology and evolution, 1, 556–570.
Rodgers TW, Xu CCY, Giacalone
J (2017) Carrion fly‐derived DNA metabarcoding is an effective tool for
mammal surveys: Evidence from a known tropical mammal community.Molecular ecology.
Schnell IB, Bohmann K, Gilbert
MTP (2015) Tag jumps illuminated–reducing sequence-to-sample
misidentifications in metabarcoding studies. Molecular ecology
resources, 15, 1289–1303.
Schnell IB, Bohmann K,
Schultze SE et al. (2018) Debugging diversity-a pan-continental
exploration of the potential of terrestrial blood-feeding leeches as a
vertebrate monitoring tool. Molecular ecology resources.
Seersholm FV, Cole TL, Grealy
A et al. (2018) Subsistence practices, past biodiversity, and
anthropogenic impacts revealed by New Zealand-wide ancient DNA survey.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America.
Seymour M, Edwards FK, Cosby
BJ et al. (2020) Executing multi-taxa eDNA ecological assessment
via traditional metrics and interactive networks. The Science of
the total environment, 729, 138801.
Shehzad W, McCarthy TM,
Pompanon F et al. (2012a) Prey preference of snow leopard
(Panthera uncia) in South Gobi, Mongolia. PloS one, 7,
e32104.
Shehzad W, Riaz T, Nawaz MAet al. (2012b) Carnivore diet analysis based on next-generation
sequencing: application to the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in
Pakistan. Molecular ecology, 21, 1951–1965.
Shin S, Lee TK, Han JM, Park
J (2014) Regional effects on chimera formation in 454 pyrosequenced
amplicons from a mock community. Journal of microbiology ,52, 566–573.
Sickel W, Ankenbrand MJ,
Grimmer G et al. (2015) Increased efficiency in identifying mixed
pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach.BMC ecology, 15, 20.
Sigsgaard EE, Nielsen IB,
Carl H et al. (2017) Seawater environmental DNA reflects
seasonality of a coastal fish community. Marine biology,164, 128.
Singer G, Fahner NA, Barnes
J, McCarthy A, Hajibabaei M (2019) Comprehensive biodiversity analysis
via ultra-deep patterned flow cell technology: a case study of eDNA
metabarcoding seawater. bioRxiv, 515890.
Sinha R, Stanley G, Gulati GSet al. (2017) Index Switching Causes “Spreading-Of-Signal”
Among Multiplexed Samples In Illumina HiSeq 4000 DNA Sequencing.bioRxiv, 125724.
Smyth RP, Schlub TE, Grimm Aet al. (2010) Reducing chimera formation during PCR amplification
to ensure accurate genotyping. Gene, 469, 45–51.
Srivathsan A, Sha J, Vogler
AP, Meier R (2015) Comparing the effectiveness of metagenomics and
metabarcoding for diet analysis of a leaf-feeding monkey (Pygathrix
nemaeus). Molecular ecology resources, 15, 250–261.
Stat M, Huggett MJ,
Bernasconi R et al. (2017) Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA:
metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment.Scientific reports, 7, 12240.
Stoeck T, Pan H, Dully V,
Forster D, Jung T (2018) Towards an eDNA metabarcode-based performance
indicator for full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants.Water research, 144, 322–331.
Swift JF, Lance RF, Guan Xet al. (2018) Multifaceted DNA metabarcoding: Validation of a
noninvasive, next-generation approach to studying bat populations.Evolutionary applications, 12, 2175.
Taberlet P, Bonin A, Zinger
L, Coissac E (2018) Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research
and Monitoring. Oxford University Press.
Taberlet P, Coissac E,
Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH (2012a) Environmental DNA. Molecular
ecology, 21, 1789–1793.
Taberlet P, Coissac E,
Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E (2012b) Towards next-generation
biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular
ecology, 21, 2045–2050.
Tang M, Hardman CJ, Ji Yet al. (2015) High-throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity
and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods in ecology and evolution /
British Ecological Society, 6, 1034–1043.
Thomsen PF, Møller PR,
Sigsgaard EE et al. (2016) Environmental DNA from Seawater
Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.PloS one, 11, e0165252.
Thomsen PF, Sigsgaard EE
(2019) Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse
communities of terrestrial arthropods. Ecology and evolution.
Valk T van der, van der Valk
T, Vezzi F et al. (2019) Index hopping on the Illumina HiseqX
platform and its consequences for ancient DNA studies.
de Vere N, Jones LE, Gilmore
T et al. (2017) Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee
foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability.Scientific reports, 7, 42838.
Vesterinen EJ, Puisto AIE,
Blomberg AS, Lilley TM (2018) Table for five, please: Dietary
partitioning in boreal bats. Ecology and evolution, 8,
10914–10937.
Vodak D, Lorenz S, Nakken Set al. (2018) Sample-Index Misassignment Impacts Tumor Exome
Sequencing.
Wang GC, Wang Y (1997)
Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR
coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes.Applied and environmental microbiology, 63, 4645–4650.
Yang C, Bohmann K, Wang Xet al. (2021) Biodiversity Soup II: A bulk‐sample metabarcoding
pipeline emphasizing error reduction. Methods in Ecology and
Evolution.
Zepeda Mendoza ML, Bohmann K,
Carmona Baez A, Gilbert MTP (2016) DAMe: a toolkit for the initial
processing of datasets with PCR replicates of double-tagged amplicons
for DNA metabarcoding analyses. BMC research notes, 9,
255.
Zhang GK, Chain FJJ, Abbott
CL, Cristescu ME (2018) Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers
increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities.Evolutionary applications, 11, 1901–1914.
Zizka VMA, Elbrecht V, Macher
J-N, Leese F (2019) Assessing the influence of sample tagging and
library preparation on DNA metabarcoding. Molecular ecology
resources.
Zizka VMA, Geiger MF, Leese F
(2020) DNA metabarcoding of stream invertebrates reveals spatio-temporal
variation but consistent status class assessments in a natural and urban
river. Ecological indicators, 115, 106383.