Persistent warming and water cycle change due to anthropogenic climate change modifies the temperature and salinity distribution of the ocean over time. This ‘forced’ signal of temperature and salinity change is often masked by the background internal variability of the climate system. Analysing temperature and salinity change in watermass-based coordinate systems has been proposed as an alternative to traditional Eulerian (e.g., fixed-depth, zonally-averaged) co-ordinate systems. The impact of internal variability is thought to be reduced in watermass co-ordinates, enabling a cleaner separation of the forced signal from background variability - or a higher ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. Building on previous analyses comparing Eulerian and water-mass-based one-dimensional coordinates, here we recast two-dimensional co-ordinate systems - temperature-salinity (T-S), latitude-longitude and latitude-depth - onto a directly comparable equal-volume framework. We compare the internal variability, or ‘noise’ in temperature and salinity between these remapped two-dimensional co-ordinate systems in a 500 year pre-industrial control run from a CMIP6 climate model. We find that median internal variability is reduced in both ocean heat and salt content in T-S space compared to Eulerian coordinates, and that a large proportion of variability in T-S space can be attributed to processes which operate over a timescale greater than 10 years. We show that, as a consequence of the reduced projection of internal variability into T-S space, the signal-to-noise ratio in watermass co-ordinates is at least two times greater than in Eulerian co-ordinate systems, implying that the climate change signal can be more robustly identified.