Are pedigree-based mutation rates the Rosetta Stone of molecular
ecology? Promises and pitfalls of whole genome comparisons among closely
related individuals.
Abstract
Germline mutations are the raw material for natural selection, driving
species evolution and the creation of earth’s biodiversity. Life on
earth would stagnate without this driver of genetic diversity. Yet, it
is a double-edged sword. An excess of mutations can have devastating
effects on fitness and population viability. It is therefore one of the
great challenges of molecular ecology to determine the rate and spectrum
by which these mutations accrue across the tree of life. Advances in
high-throughput sequencing are providing new opportunities for
characterizing these rates and patterns within species and populations,
thus informing essential evolutionary parameters such as the timing of
speciation events, the intricacies of historical demography, and the
degree to which lineages are subject to the burdens of mutational load.
Here, we will focus on the applications and limitations of whole-genome
comparisons among closely related individuals in what are typically
described as “trio” analyses for the detection of germline mutations
as they arise in real time. By sequencing and comparing whole-genomes
generated for individuals of known relatedness – typically, parent to
offspring – investigators can ideally count and characterize mutations
as they appear per generation. The promise for gaining insight into
classic hypotheses of molecular evolution is high, though so too is the
cost. Namely, the technical challenges are daunting given that
pedigree-based studies are essentially searching for needles in a
haystack. Even so, the opportunities are so enticing, and the field so
young, we can say with confidence that fundamental insights have only
just begun to emerge.