loading page

Modeling Snow Dynamics and Stable Water Isotopes Across Mountain Landscapes
  • +5
  • Rosemary W.H. Carroll,
  • Jeffrey S Deems,
  • Matthias Sprenger,
  • Reed M. Maxwell,
  • Wendy S Brown,
  • Alexander Newman,
  • Beutler Curtis A,
  • Kenneth Hurst Williams
Rosemary W.H. Carroll
Desert Research Institute

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jeffrey S Deems
University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
Matthias Sprenger
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Author Profile
Reed M. Maxwell
Princeton University
Author Profile
Wendy S Brown
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Author Profile
Alexander Newman
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Author Profile
Beutler Curtis A
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Author Profile
Kenneth Hurst Williams
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile

Abstract

A coupled hydrologic and snowpack stable water isotope model assesses controls on isotopic inputs across a large, mountainous basin. The most depleted isotope conditions occur in the upper subalpine where snow accumulation is high and rainfall is low. Snowmelt evolution over time indicates isotopic enrichment is not dictated by melt fractionation but is determined by elevation which controls the amount, phase and isotopic mass of spring precipitation coincident with the ablation period. With respect to snowpack kinetic fractionation, its effect on snowmelt is a balance between energy and snow-availability. It is highest above treeline and in the shrub-dominated upper montane where vegetation shading is low, while deep snowpack and conifer forests limit the influence of kinetic fractionation in the subalpine. Wet years reduce the effects of snowpack fraction on snowmelt across the basin, except in the lower montane where added snowfall bolsters water-limited conditions.