loading page

HIGH RATES OF DE NOVO MALIGNANCY COMPROMISE POST-HEART TRANSPLANTATION SURVIVAL
  • +6
  • Katherine Giuliano,
  • Joseph Canner,
  • Eric Etchill,
  • Alejandro Suarez Pierre,
  • Chun Choi,
  • Robert Higgins,
  • Steven Hsu,
  • Kavita Sharma,
  • Ahmet Kilic
Katherine Giuliano
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Joseph Canner
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Author Profile
Eric Etchill
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Author Profile
Alejandro Suarez Pierre
University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine
Author Profile
Chun Choi
Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine
Author Profile
Robert Higgins
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Author Profile
Steven Hsu
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Author Profile
Kavita Sharma
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Author Profile
Ahmet Kilic
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Transplant patients are known to be at increased risk of developing de novo malignancies (DNM). As heart transplant survival has increased, DNM represent an obstacle to further improving survival. We sought to examine the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic factors of post-transplant DNM. Methods: We studied adult heart transplant recipients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (1987-2018). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine annual probabilities of developing DNM, excluding squamous and basal cell carcinoma. Rates were compared to the general population in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to calculate hazard ratios for risk factors of DNM development, all-cause, and cancer-specific mortality. Results: Over median follow-up of 6.9 years, 18% of the 49,361 patients developed DNM, which correlated with an incidence rate 3.8 times that of the general population. The most common malignancies were lung, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and prostate. Risk was most increased for female genital, tongue/throat, and renal cancers. Male gender, older age, smoking history, and impaired renal function were risk factors for developing DNM, whereas the use of MMF for immunosuppression was protective. Cigarette use, increasing age, the use of ATG for induction and calcineurin inhibitors for maintenance were risk factors for cancer-specific mortality. The development of a DNM increased the risk of death by 40% (p<0.001). Conclusions: Heart transplant patients are at increased risk of malignancy post-transplant, particularly rare cancers. Strict cancer surveillance and attention to immunosuppressive regimens are critical for further prolonging post-transplant survival.
15 Sep 2020Submitted to Journal of Cardiac Surgery
16 Sep 2020Submission Checks Completed
16 Sep 2020Assigned to Editor
16 Sep 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
07 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
14 Oct 20201st Revision Received
17 Oct 2020Submission Checks Completed
17 Oct 2020Assigned to Editor
17 Oct 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
23 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
23 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Accept
10 Feb 2021Published in Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 10.1111/jocs.15416