No gas source, no problem: proximity to pre-existing embolism and
segmentation affect embolism spreading in angiosperm xylem by gas
diffusion
- Xinyi Guan,
- Luciano Pereira,
- Scott McAdam,
- Kun-Fang Cao,
- Steven Jansen
Luciano Pereira
Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University,
Author ProfileKun-Fang Cao
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilisation of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University
Author ProfileSteven Jansen
Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University
Author ProfileAbstract
Embolism spreading in dehydrating angiosperm xylem is driven by gas
movement between embolised and sap-filled conduits. Here, we examine how
proximity to pre-existing embolism and hydraulic segmentation affect
embolism propagation. Based on the optical method, we compared xylem
embolism resistance between detached leaves and leaves attached to
branches, and between intact leaves and leaves with cut minor veins for
six species. Moreover, we directly compared the optical and pneumatic
method on detached leaves. Embolism resistance of detached leaves was
significantly lower than leaves attached to stems, except for two
species with all vessels ending in their petioles. Cutting of minor
veins showed limited embolism spreading in minor veins near the cuts
prior to major veins. Moreover, there was strong agreement in embolism
resistance between the optical and pneumatic method, with minor
differences occurring during early stages of embolism formation. We
conclude that embolism resistance may represent a relative trait,
depending on the proximity and connectivity to pre-existing embolism as
a gas source. Since embolism formation may not rely on a certain
pressure difference threshold between functional and embolised conduits,
we suggest that embolism is facilitated by pressure-driven gas
diffusion, while hydraulic segmentation can prevent embolism propagation
by reducing gas diffusion.17 Nov 2020Submitted to Plant, Cell & Environment 17 Nov 2020Submission Checks Completed
17 Nov 2020Assigned to Editor
18 Nov 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
06 Jan 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Jan 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
14 Jan 20211st Revision Received
16 Jan 2021Submission Checks Completed
16 Jan 2021Assigned to Editor
18 Jan 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
18 Jan 2021Editorial Decision: Accept