Bigger is not always better: selection on body mass varies across life
stages in a hibernating mammal
Abstract
Body mass is often viewed as a proxy of past access to resources and of
future survival and reproductive success. Links between body mass and
survival or reproduction are, however, likely to differ between age
classes and sexes. Remarkably, this is rarely taken into account in
selection analyses. Selection on body mass is likely to be the primary
target accounting for juvenile survival until reproduction but may
weaken after recruitment. Males and females also often differ in how
they use resources for reproduction and survival. Using a long-term
study on yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer), we show that body
mass was under stabilizing selection in the first years of life, before
recruitment, which changed to positive directional selection as age
increased and animals matured. We found no evidence that selection
across age-classes on body mass differed between sexes. By investigating
the link between running speed and body mass, we show that the capacity
to escape predators was not consistent across age classes and followed a
quadratic relationship at young ages only. Overall, our results indicate
that mature age classes exhibit traditional patterns of positive
selection on body mass, as expected in a hibernating mammal, but that
mass in the first years of life is subject to stabilizing selection
which may come from additional predation pressures that negate the
benefits of the largest body masses. Our study highlights the importance
to disentangle selection pressures on traits across critical age (or
life) classes.