Sectioning Protocol Determines Accuracy of Intraoperative Pathological
Examination of Sentinel Lymph Node in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background In cervical cancer, the benefits of sentinel lymph node
biopsy (SLNB) have long been confined by the lack of precise
intraoperative pathological examination. Objective To determine the
diagnostic performance and optimal protocol of frozen section
examination (FSE) in SLNB for cervical cancer. Search Strategy PubMed,
EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data and China
National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched from inception to July
30, 2019. Selection Criteria Studies reporting the data of SLNB combined
with FSE in cervical cancer were included. Data Collection and Analysis
Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Bivariate mixed-effects
regression model was applied for analyses. Sensitivity of FSE in
detecting SLN metastasis was the primary diagnostic indicator for
evaluation. Main Results The pooled sensitivity of FSE among 31 eligible
studies (1887 patients) was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.85) with high
heterogeneity (I2=69.73%). Two representative
FSE protocols were identified from 26 studies, described as equatorial
(E-protocol, SLN was bisected) and latitudinal (L-protocol, SLN was cut
at intervals). Meta-regression showed that FSE protocol was the only
source of heterogeneity (p<0.001). The pooled sensitivity was
0.86 (95% CI 0.79–0.91, I2=0%) and 0.59
(0.46–0.72, I2=58.47%) for FSE using L- and
E- protocol, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of FSE using
L-protocol would reach 0.97 (0.89–0.99) if only marcometastases were
considered. These findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions With L-protocol, FSE can provide precise intraoperative
pathology for SLNB, which enables immediate decision-making for
individualized managements. Keywords Cervical cancer, sentinel lymph
node, metastasis, frozen section, sensitivity, meta-analysis.