Gestational surrogacy for women with recurrent pregnancy loss due to refractory chronic histiocytic intervillositis: Research Letter

Background Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are recommended in threatened preterm labour to improve short term neonatal outcome. Preclinical animal studies suggest detrimental effects of ACS exposure on offspring cardiac development; their effects in humans are unknown. Objectives To systematically review the human clinical literature to determine the effects of ACS on offspring cardiovascular function. Main results Twenty-six studies including 1921 patients were included, of which most were cohort studies of mixed quality. The type of ACS exposure, gestational age at exposure, dose and number of administrations varied widely. Offspring cardiovascular outcomes were assessed from one day to 36 years postnatally. The most commonly assessed parameter was arterial blood pressure (18 studies), followed by echocardiography (8 studies), heart rate (5 studies), electrocardiogram (ECG, 3 studies) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1 study). There were no clinically significant effects of ACS exposure on offspring blood pressure. However, there were insufficient studies assessing cardiac structure and function using echocardiography or cardiac MRI to be able to determine an effect. Conclusions Administration of ACS is not associated with long-term effects on blood pressure in exposed human offspring. The effects on cardiac structure and other measures of cardiac function were unclear due to the small number of studies, study heterogeneity and mixed quality. Given the emerging preclinical evidence of harm following ACS exposure, there is a need for further research to assess central cardiac function in human offspring exposed to ACS. Keywords: Antenatal corticosteroids, ACS, cardiovascular, offspring, blood pressure

References1. Ravi, K.; Gunawardana, S.; Ravi, K.; Abeywickrema, M.; Davies, M.; Tough, E. et al. Why stillbirth deserves a place on the medical school curriculum: Stillbirth-related teaching in UK medical schools. BJOG. 2020;127(3):414.2. Frøen, J. E.; Heazell, A.E P.; Flenady, V.; de Bernis, L.; Kinney, M. V.; Blencowe, H. et al. The Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths Study Group. Ending preventable stillbirths: an executive summary for The Lancet’s series. Lancet [Internet]. 2016 18 May 2019. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/stories/series/stillbirths2016-exec-summ.pdf.3. UK Foundation Programme Office. F2 Career Destinations Report. 2018.4. Burden, C.; Bradley, S.; Storey, C.; Ellis, A.; Heazell, A.E.P.; Downe, S. et al. From grief, guilt pain and stigma to hope and pride - a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed-method research of the psychosocial impact of stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:9.—————————————————————————————————————————Funding Support: No specific funding received.—————————————————————————————————————————Statement of Contribution to Authorship: E.C. and D.S. conceived the idea for the Commentary. E.C. performed the literature review and wrote the initial version of the manuscript. D.S. supervised the writing of the manuscript and provided critical feedback prior to submission of the final version.—————————————————————————————————————————Disclosure of Interests: D.S. is an Executive Scientific Editor for BJOG. Otherwise the authors declare that they have no known competing interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.—————————————————————————————————————————