Given that countries have their own unique words that can be equivalent to broader impacts, broader impacts-like NTPs could be also characterized as societal benefitting-like NTPs. This is a more accessible, politically correct, and universal classification system compared to categorizing these NTPs as broader impacts-like (CN1). Note: CN stands for content notes and are located at the bottom of this article.
After the NTPs from around the world were identified, collected and organized, an NTP cross-case analysis was performed in 2014-2015 and again in 2016-2017. This was done to elucidate a definition of broader impacts using an established research methodology. This methodology is an extension of the previous work performed by Davis and Laas in 2013, which compared the European Union’s (EU’s) Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) to NSF Broader Impacts (BI)[1].
The definition resulting from this cross-case analysis is that broader impacts is a process involving people/stakeholders to achieve a societal benefit that is measured or assessed and is accomplished in a finite amount of time. This process can be done through one’s teaching, research, service, and occupation. There can be broader impacts of almost anything. If done appropriately, broader impacts can lead to sustainable positive impacts [2], [3], [4], [5].
Stakeholders is not used here in a traditional imperialistic or colonized sense. The word stakeholders, is used to refer to almost anyone or anything involved in this process. Thus, all those involved in the process should be considered stakeholders and be treated equitably as partners and not subjects.
Beginning to Understand the “Nature of Broader Impacts”
This research-based definition enables one to better understand how to think in a broader impacts paradigm. This definition aligns with engagement frameworks and activities, including but not limited to: community engagement, engaged scholarship, outreach, and empowerment theory [6], [7]. It also encompasses the aspects many researchers associate with NSF Broader Impacts (BI) [8], [9], [10].
The definition, and its similar basis to engagement theory provides the foundation for constructing a broader impacts conceptual framework [6], [7], [8], [9]. This new framework adheres to an engagement-outcome-impact paradigm (Fig. 2) that is societally-centric in the context of an individual’s[11] and group’s developing identity and “living legacy” (CN2).