This example manuscript is intended to serve as a tutorial and template for authors to use when writing their own AAS Journal articles with Authorea. The manuscript includes a history of   and documents the new features in the previous version, 6.0, as well as the new features in version 6.1. This manuscript includes figure and table examples to illustrate these new features. AUTHOREA FEATURES A RICH TEXT EDITOR SO THAT YOU CAN WRITE IN LATEX, MARKDOWN, OR RICH TEXT AND RENDER DIRECTLY ON THE WEB. AUTHOREA SUPPORTS AND RENDERS THE VAST MAJORITY OF LATEX NOTATION NEEDED FOR AAS JOURNAL ARTICLES. A FEW FEATURES PROVIDED BY AASTEX V6.1. THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN AUTHOREA HAVE BEEN LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT. Authors are welcome replace the text, tables, figures, and bibliography with their own and submit the resulting manuscript to the AAS Journals peer review system. The first lesson in the tutorial is to remind authors that the AAS Journals, the Astrophysical Journal (ApJ), the Astrophysical Journal Letters (ApJL), and Astronomical Journal (AJ), all have a 250 word limit for the abstract. If you exceed this length the Editorial office will ask you to shorten it.

A document by Daniel (Goldman). Click on the document to view its contents.

Social media is like a magnet that can draw attention to our research One day I received an email from a researcher who is living in Japan. He said there’s something wrong with my supplementary data set which was published in a paper in 2014. Apparently there was a miss-location in one of the coordinates. Recently, I received an email from a fellow researcher from UK asking for my availability to be the co-PI (Principal Investigator) on a project. Both researchers said they know me and my work from social media. I EVEN GOT INVITED FOR A COFFEE SCIENCE-TALK ORIGINATING FROM A “MENTION” ON TWITTER. Social media opens what once a closed-loop Although Indonesia is the 4th most populated country in the world, it doesn’t make our research have more impact. This is mostly due to language barrier and limited network. FOR YEARS WE TEND TO DO RESEARCH ONLY AS PERSONAL OR ORGANIZATIONAL EVENT, NO MORE AND NO LESS. Nevertheless, out of that manner, we demand acknowledgment, citations, and better yet we use that citation counts to judge who are more prominent than others. Research had been placed as a closed-loop activity, with no attention from others except the team member itself. More and more research will ended up as closed report and then locked up in somebody’s drawers or some dusty shelves in the library. Social media could be the answer we’ve been looking for. Continue reading and we will show you that IT IS THE ANSWER WE’VE BEEN LOOKING FOR. Please kindly visit my ScienceOpen interview with Jon Tennant. Social media creates and opens more doors of opportunity Before we know and use social media, as academics living in a developing country, we have suffered from brain drain, lack of ideas, lack of facilities, lack of information and limited network. Today, we can harvest ideas in a snap, add some thoughts, and having more ideas in return. We can exchange ideas with people from the other side of the globe (or other part of the world, for those who believe the earth is flat-your choice). We know about the latest work/ scholarship offers within minutes. It is that easy. We read more science than ever before; we learn from it and disseminate it further. Borrowing [@Thesiswhisperer](www.twitter.com/thesiswhisperer) ’s words “WHEN I READ THE TWEETS OF OTHERS I CONSUME THEIR THOUGHTS AND IDEAS”. We believe people now capture ideas more quickly from social media feeds. Instead of have a direct conversation, most of us are now skillful in fast reading and typing to explain something in less than 160 characters. Social media attracts more scientific-generousity So you might ask what did we and so many others do on social media. Did we just create and respond to random posts or chats, spend more time on it than on our real work, the one we get paid for? No, we simply share what we know and re-tweet others’ that we thought would be valuable for our followers. It could be an inspirational one, a knowledge-driven one, or even a funny one. We don’t intend to brag (or humblebrag) about what we do, we’re just letting others know what we have achieved, and what we have not due to many obstacles. Share the ones we know and the ones we don’t. A KIND SOUL WOULD STEP FORWARD AND TELL YOU WHAT’S WRONG WITH YOUR WORK AND HOW YOU CAN MAKE IT MORE SOUND. Social media multiplies learning curve Many times, we just send out words. We don’t know who would read nor deeply care about them, but oftentimes people just show up and send us their opinions, corrections, and inputs to expand and enrich our work. On the other hand, simplest rule of nature applies, “you reap what you sow”. SOCIAL MEDIA IS A GIANT ‘TAKE AND GIVE’ SPYDER WEB. We share solutions, instant help, or just send our sincere and deepest sympathy. In the future, others will help you in a way you could never predict. OUR NUMBER ONE MOTTO AS HEALTHY AND BREATHING ACADEMICS IS ‘THE MORE WE SHARE THE MORE WE LEARN’. Isn’t it a wonderful way to live our life?

ABSTRACT. Research and scholarship lead to the generation of new knowledge. The dissemination of this knowledge has a fundamental impact on the ways in which society develops and progresses, and at the same time it feeds back to improve subsequent research and scholarship. Here, as in so many other areas of human activity, the internet is changing the way things work: it opens up opportunities for new processes that can accelerate the growth of knowledge, including the creation of new means of communicating that knowledge among researchers and within the wider community. Two decades of emergent and increasingly pervasive information technology have demonstrated the potential for far more effective scholarly communication. However, the use of this technology remains limited; research processes and the dissemination of research results have yet to fully assimilate the capabilities of the web and other digital media. Producers and consumers remain wedded to formats developed in the era of print publication, and the reward systems for researchers remain tied to those delivery mechanisms. Force11 (the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship) is a community of scholars, librarians, archivists, publishers and research funders that has arisen organically to help facilitate the change toward improved knowledge creation and sharing. Individually and collectively, we aim to bring about a change in scholarly communication through the effective use of information technology. Force11 has grown from a small group of like-minded individuals into an open movement with clearly identified stakeholders associated with emerging technologies, policies, funding mechanisms and business models. While not disputing the expressive power of the written word to communicate complex ideas, our foundational assumption is that scholarly communication by means of semantically-enhanced media-rich digital publishing is likely to have a greater impact than communication in traditional print media or electronic facsimiles of printed works. However, to date, online versions of ’scholarly outputs’ have tended to replicate print forms, rather than exploit the additional functionalities afforded by the digital terrain. We believe that digital publishing of enhanced papers will enable more effective scholarly communication, which will also broaden to include, for example, better links to data, the publication of software tools, mathematical models, protocols and workflows, and research communication by means of social media channels. This document highlights the findings of the Force11 workshop on the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship held at Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, in August 2011: it summarizes a number of key problems facing scholarly publishing today, and presents a vision that addresses these problems, proposing concrete steps that key stakeholders can take to improve the state of scholarly publishing. More about Force11 can be found at http://www.force11.org. This White Paper is a collaborative effort that reflects the input of all Force11 attendees at the Dagstuhl Workshop [1], and is very much a living document [2] . We see it as a starting point that will grow and be updated and augmented by individual and collective efforts by the participants and others. We invite you to join and contribute to this enterprise. [1] https://sites.google.com/site/futureofresearchcommunications/home/attendees [2] Citation: Bourne P, Clark T, Dale R, de Waard A, Herman I, Hovy E and Shotton D, on behalf of the Force11 community (2011).  Force11 White Paper: Improving the Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship. 27 October 2011.  Available from http://force11.org/ Copyright: © 2011 The authors. License: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (v3.0, unported: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

(250 Word Max) Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duis vestibulum diam a eleifend tincidunt. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Morbi libero risus, pretium ac urna vel, iaculis sagittis nisl. Duis non sapien justo. Quisque elementum, mauris a ullamcorper pharetra, mauris enim ullamcorper urna, sit amet fermentum sem nulla vel nibh. Etiam id urna non leo condimentum egestas pulvinar sit amet ex. Aenean faucibus eget dui at gravida. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum sodales neque dolor, et mollis turpis viverra non.

Source: http://ctan.org/pkg/xii \let~\catcode~`76~`A13~`F1~`j00~`P2jdefA71F~`7113jdefPALLF PA''FwPA;;FPAZZFLaLPA//71F71iPAHHFLPAzzFenPASSFthP;A$$FevP A@@FfPARR717273F737271P;ADDFRgniPAWW71FPATTFvePA**FstRsamP AGGFRruoPAqq71.72.F717271PAYY7172F727171PA??Fi*LmPA&&71jfi Fjfi71PAVVFjbigskipRPWGAUU71727374 75,76Fjpar71727375Djifx :76jelse&U76jfiPLAKK7172F71l7271PAXX71FVLnOSeL71SLRyadR@oL RrhC?yLRurtKFeLPFovPgaTLtReRomL;PABB71 72,73:Fjif.73.jelse B73:jfiXF71PU71 72,73:PWs;AMM71F71diPAJJFRdriPAQQFRsreLPAI I71Fo71dPA!!FRgiePBt'el@ lTLqdrYmu.Q.,Ke;vz vzLqpip.Q.,tz; ;Lql.IrsZ.eap,qn.i. i.eLlMaesLdRcna,;!;h htLqm.MRasZ.ilk,% s$;z zLqs'.ansZ.Ymi,/sx ;LYegseZRyal,@i;@ TLRlogdLrDsW,@;G LcYlaDLbJsW,SWXJW ree @rzchLhzsW,;WERcesInW qt.'oL.Rtrul;e doTsW,Wk;Rri@stW aHAHHFndZPpqar.tridgeLinZpe.LtYer.W,:jend{document}

The scientific community holds elections for various academies, positions, and prizes. Much like in politics, the elections have not always been open to everyone. Here we highlight 8 "firsts" in elections in light of the current United States presidential election. 

The 2016 Olympics have captivated the world -- records are breaking, medal counts are climbing, and nationalism is roaring! It's all very exciting. It should get even more exciting in Tokyo in four years time at the 2020 games when several new sports are scheduled to be introduced, including surfing, skateboarding, and... research! Okay, research definitely won't be included, but what if it were? How would each country fare? Here we look at research output vs. Olympic prowess on a per-country basis.

INTRODUCTION LaTeX is typesetting software that is widely used by mathematicians and physicists because it is so good at typesetting equations. It is also completely programmable, so it can be configured to produce documents with almost any desired formatting, and to automatically number equations, figures, endnotes, and so on. To prepare manuscripts for the American Journal of Physics (AJP), you should use the REVTeX 4.1 format for Physical Review B preprints, as indicated in the documentclass line at the top of this article’s source file. (If you’re already familiar with LaTeX and have used other LaTeX formats, please resist the temptation to use them, or to otherwise override REVTeX’s formatting conventions, in manuscripts that you prepare for AJP.) This sample article is intended as a tutorial, template, and reference for AJP authors, illustrating most of the LaTeX and REVTeX features that authors will need. For a more comprehensive introduction to LaTeX, numerous books and online references are available. Documentation for the REVTeX package can be found on the APS web site. LaTeX is free software, available for Unix/Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows operating systems. For downloading and installation instructions, follow the links from the LaTeX web site. It is most convenient to install a “complete TeX distribution,” which will include LaTeX, the underlying TeX engine, macro packages such as REVTeX, a large collection of fonts, and GUI tools for editing and viewing your documents. To test your installation, try to process this sample article.

TFS FILE FORMAT TFS is a an acronym for the “Table File System”. TFS files have been used in the LEP control system. The program knows only coded TFS files. The TFS format has been chosen for all table output of . TFS formatted tables can be read back into , and may then be further processed.

In the last portion of _Sidereus Nuncius_, Galileo reported his discovery of FOUR OBJECTS that appeared to form a straight line of stars near JUPITER. The first night, he witnessed a line of three little stars close to Jupiter parallel to the ecliptic; the following nights brought different arrangements and another star into his view, totaling four stars around Jupiter. Throughout the text, Galileo gave illustrations of the relative positions of Jupiter and its apparent companion stars as they appeared nightly from late January through early March 1610. The fact that they changed their positions relative to Jupiter from night to night, but always appeared in the same straight line near Jupiter, brought Galileo to deduce that they were four bodies in orbit around Jupiter. On January 11 after 4 nights of observation he wrote: “I therefore concluded and decided unhesitatingly, that there are three stars in the heavens moving about Jupiter, as Venus and Mercury round the Sun; which at length was established as clear as daylight by numerous subsequent observations. These observations also established that there are not only three, but four, erratic sidereal bodies performing their revolutions round Jupiter...the revolutions are so swift that an observer may generally get differences of position every hour.”

This following document is the HTML version of https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V6M2TBrian Nosek, Melanie Benjamin, Sara Bowman, Michael Haselton, David Litherland, Natalie Meyers, Nicole Pfeiffer, Andrew Sallans, Rusty Speidel, Jeffrey Spies, Matthew Spitzer

HOW TO USE THIS TEMPLATE Please use this template for preparing your article for _F1000Research_ in conjunction with our (author guidelines). You may not need to complete all the sections below depending on the article type. Please edit the sections below to add your article content and delete any sections that are not required for your article type.

Abstract goes here.

Priority ReportsShort, definitive reports of findings of high impact, significance, and timeliness. These reports receive an accelerated review. Papers submitted as Priority Reports should include a section for Materials and Methods as well as Results and Discussion (Results and Discussion may be combined but Materials and Methods may not be combined with any other section). The Editor-in-Chief and members of the senior editorial board reserve the right to edit title, abstract, and précis for articles that are accepted to improve their clarity, brevity, and quality.

The  participation of scholars and scientists in government has attracted attention since at least the time of Plato. The ancient Greek philosopher envisioned a philosopher-scientist running the Ideal State. However, his own experience in politics was far from ideal and he ended being sold as a slave by the tyrant he had tried to educate. Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the participation of academics in cabinets, largely due to the overtly anti-scientific message of the current US administration.In this short post, we aim to assess empirically how the cabinets of the seven countries recently banned from travel to the US (Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Libya) compare in number of advanced degrees (degrees above Masters level: MS, MBA, JD, PhD, MD, DVM) and advanced technical degrees (PhD, MD, DVM) compared to the White House cabinet.We used the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) listing of world leaders  and information on Wikipedia and the web to identify the cabinet members of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and the United States as of January 2017. All the data that we collected and used for this post is open and available under the Data git folder of this article.ResultsAmong a total of 245 eligible cabinet positions analyzed (ranging from 13 to 42 per country), 79 (32%) were filled by members that attained a graduate degree of higher education.Advanced Degrees: United States ranks firstThe United States' cabinet has the cabinet with the highest number of advanced degrees (MS, MBA, JD, PhD, MD, DVM), with over 60% of its members holding a Masters degree or above (Figure 1).  Iran is second in the list, with about half of its cabinet members holding advanced degrees. 

If you run a company or a website, cohort analysis is a great way to understand engagement and retention of your users. For example, how many of your users who signed up in June went back to your site in July? The chart below, for example, shows that 33.36% of all users who signed up on Month 0, came back to the site on Month 1. Google Analytics recently added cohort analysis to the set of metrics that they offer to their users, so that you can generate retention curves like the one below on the fly. It is still in Beta, but it allows you to understand user retention over time, especially if you use Google Analytics with User ID view, that is: you track data of signed up users with accounts.

Let’s try: testing here. Here is an attempt: testing 1 + 2 = 3 here.