loading page

Quantitative causality, causality-guided scientific discovery, and causal machine learning
  • +1
  • X. San Liang,
  • X San Liang,
  • Dake Chen,
  • Renhe Zhang
X. San Liang

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
X San Liang
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Fudan University, Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Laboratory, School of Artificial Intelligence, Sun Yat-Sen University
Dake Chen
Division of Frontier Research, Southern Marine Laboratory, School of Artificial Intelligence, Sun Yat-Sen University
Renhe Zhang
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Fudan University

Abstract

It has been said, arguably, that causality analysis should pave a promising way to interpretable deep learning and generalization. Incorporation of causality into artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, however, is challenged with its vagueness, non-quantitiveness, computational inefficiency, etc. During the past 18 years, these challenges have been essentially resolved, with the establishment of a rigorous formalism of causality analysis initially motivated from atmospheric predictability. This not only opens a new field in the atmosphere-ocean science, namely, information flow, but also has led to scientific discoveries in other disciplines, such as quantum mechanics, neuroscience, financial economics, etc., through various applications. This note provides a brief review of the decade-long effort, including a list of major theoretical results, a sketch of the causal deep learning framework, and some representative real-world applications in geoscience pertaining to this journal, such as those on the anthropogenic cause of global warming, the decadal prediction of El Niño Modoki, the forecasting of an extreme drought in China, among others.
21 Feb 2024Submitted to ESS Open Archive
28 Feb 2024Published in ESS Open Archive