loading page

Properties and limitations of eDNA substrates for terrestrial animal monitoring
  • Beilun Zhao,
  • Tobias Andermann
Beilun Zhao
Author Profile
Tobias Andermann
Uppsala University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a crucial tool for monitoring terrestrial animals, yet numerous variables can influence species detection. Among these, the choice of sampling substrate and method is paramount and should align with the specific research objectives. This review provides a thorough overview of eDNA sampling methods and substrates, focusing on their effectiveness in detecting species across various spatiotemporal scales. We categorize substrates into three groups: abiotic (soil, water, air), biotic (invertebrate, spiderweb, plant tissue, plant swab), and trace (scat, material with trace, material from artificial setup). Additionally, we address key processes leading to false-negatives and -positives due to spatial and temporal mismatches between the eDNA source and the sampling. Practical considerations for designing sampling plans are also discussed, including strategies to enhance detection accuracy and considerations tailored to specific taxa and habitats.
08 Oct 2024Submitted to Molecular Ecology Resources
10 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
10 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
10 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
11 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned