Abstract

The HADDOCK team participated in CAPRI rounds 47-55 as both server, manual predictor, and scorers. Throughout these CAPRI rounds, we used a plethora of computational strategies to predict the structure of protein complexes. Of the 10 targets comprising 24 interfaces, we achieved acceptable or better models for 3 targets in the human category and 1 in the server category. Our performance in the scoring challenge was slightly better, with our simple scoring protocol being the only one capable of identifying an acceptable model for Target 234. This result highlights the robustness of the simple, fully physics-based HADDOCK scoring function, especially when applied to highly flexible antibody-antigen complexes. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning for structural biology and the dramatic improvement in our success rates after the public release of Alphafold2, we identify the integration of classical approaches like HADDOCK with AI-driven structure prediction methods as a key strategy for improving the accuracy of model generation and scoring.