loading page

Stage 2 Registered Report: Propositional thought is sufficient for imaginal extinction as shown by contrasting participants with aphantasia, simulated aphantasia, and controls
  • +2
  • Merlin Monzel,
  • Thomas Agren,
  • Matthias Tengler,
  • Jana Karneboge,
  • Martin Reuter
Merlin Monzel
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Thomas Agren
Uppsala University
Author Profile
Matthias Tengler
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn
Author Profile
Jana Karneboge
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn
Author Profile
Martin Reuter
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn
Author Profile

Abstract

Imaginal exposure is a standard procedure of cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders. It is often used when in vivo exposure is not possible, too stressful for patients, or would be too expensive. The Bio-Informational Theory implies that imaginal exposure is effective because of the perceptual proximity of mental imagery to real events, whereas empirical findings suggest that propositional thought of fear stimuli (i.e., thinking about the stimuli without seeing them in the mind’s eye) could be sufficient. To investigate whether mental imagery or propositional thought is crucial for the success of imaginal exposure, participants with the rare state of aphantasia (= absence of sensory mental imagery) and two control groups were subjected to a fear conditioning paradigm followed by imaginal exposure and a reinstatement procedure. During imaginal exposure, a control group (N = 30) stared at a bright screen to disrupt visual imagery by incoming luminance (= simulated aphantasia), while a second control group (N = 30) and participants with actual aphantasia (N = 30) kept their eyes closed. Results showed successful extinction in all groups, thus demonstrating that imaginal extinction is possible using propositional thought. Moreover, results indicate that people with aphantasia experience less emotional distress during the fear conditioning procedure, most likely due to similar mechanisms as in alexithymia, i.e., a decoupling between physiological arousal and emotional experience.
Submitted to Psychophysiology
13 Jun 2024Submission Checks Completed
13 Jun 2024Assigned to Editor
10 Jul 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
22 Jul 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
07 Oct 20241st Revision Received
08 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
08 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
08 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
15 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned