Abstract

Non-native plants are typically released from specialist enemies in new ranges, but continue to be attacked by generalists, but whether they shift relative allocation to constitutive or induced defenses is unknown. We compared herbivory on co-occurring native and non-native species and also constitutive and induced defenses. Non-natives suffered less damage than natives and constitutive defenses of non-natives was lower than that of native congeners, whereas induced defense was the opposite. The strength of constitutive defenses for a species was correlated with the intensity of herbivory experienced, for non-natives, whereas induced defenses showed the reverse. The defenses of natives were not related to herbivory pressure. Finally, the strength of induced defenses correlated positively with growth, suggesting a novel mechanism for the evolution of increased competitive ability. These results expand our understanding of fundamental tradeoffs in constitutive and induced defenses and provide novel insight into how herbivory pressure affects defense allocation.