loading page

How do earthquakes stop? Insights from a minimal model of frictional rupture
  • +1
  • Fabian Barras,
  • Kjetil Thøgersen,
  • Einat Aharonov,
  • François Renard
Fabian Barras
University of Oslo

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Kjetil Thøgersen
University of Oslo
Author Profile
Einat Aharonov
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Author Profile
François Renard
University of Oslo
Author Profile

Abstract

The question “what arrests an earthquake rupture?” sits at the heart of any potential prediction of earthquake magnitude. Here, we use a one-dimensional, thin-elastic-strip, minimal model, to illuminate the basic physical parameters that control the arrest of large ruptures. The generic formulation of the model allows for wrapping various earthquake arrest scenarios into the variations of two dimensionless variables $\bar \tau_k$ (initial pre-stress on the fault) and $\bar d_c$ (fracture energy), valid for both in-plane and antiplane shear loading. Our continuum model is equivalent to the standard Burridge-Knopoff model, with an added characteristic length scale, $H$, that corresponds to either the thickness of the damage zone for strike-slip faults or to the thickness of the downward moving plate for subduction settings. We simulate the propagation and arrest of frictional ruptures and derive closed-form expressions to predict rupture arrest under different conditions. Our generic model illuminates the different energy budget that mediates crack- and pulse-like rupture propagation and arrest. It provides additional predictions such as generic stable pulse-like rupture solutions, stress drop independence of the rupture size, the existence of back-propagating fronts, and predicts that asymmetric slip profiles arise under certain pre-stress conditions. These diverse features occur also in natural earthquakes, and the fact that they can all be predicted by a single minimal framework is encouraging and pave the way for future developments of this model.