loading page

Rethinking Committee Work in the Research Enterprise: The Case of Regenerative Gatekeeping
  • +5
  • Jonathan C. Lewis,
  • Aixa Aleman-Diaz,
  • Mona Behl,
  • Sarah Kolesar,
  • Lisa White,
  • Brandon Jones,
  • Corey Garza,
  • Sharon K. Cooper
Jonathan C. Lewis
Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Aixa Aleman-Diaz
American Geophysical Union, American Geophysical Union, American Geophysical Union, American Geophysical Union
Author Profile
Mona Behl
University of Georgia, University of Georgia, University of Georgia, University of Georgia
Author Profile
Sarah Kolesar
Oregon State University, Oregon State University, Oregon State University, Oregon State University
Author Profile
Lisa White
Museum of Paleontology, Museum of Paleontology, Museum of Paleontology, University of California Berkeley, Museum of Paleontology, University of California Berkeley
Author Profile
Brandon Jones
National Science Foundation, National Science Foundation, National Science Foundation, National Science Foundation
Author Profile
Corey Garza
California State University Monterey Bay, California State University Monterey Bay, California State University Monterey Bay, California State University Monterey Bay
Author Profile
Sharon K. Cooper
Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
Author Profile

Abstract

Committees profoundly influence the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research enterprise. However, the potential power of gatekeeping in committee work has received little attention in Earth and space sciences. We suggest “regenerative gatekeeping” to challenge institutional inertia. By embracing values of belonging, accessibility, justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion in committee work, we imagine new possibilities that are aspirational and enabling. Two examples, a hiring committee process and a seminar series innovation, highlight the need to self-assess policies and practices, ask critical questions, and engage in generative conflict. Rethinking committee work can activate distributed mechanisms needed to promote change.