Jeff Dozier

University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara
Corresponding Author:dozier@ucsb.edu
Author ProfileEdward H. Bair

University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Santa Barbara
Author ProfileLatha Baskaran
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Author ProfilePhilip Gregory Brodrick

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Author ProfileNimrod Carmon
Jet PRopulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet PRopulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet PRopulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet PRopulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet PRopulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Author ProfileDavid Ray Thompson

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Author ProfileAbstract
Chemical and biological composition of surface materials and physical
structure and arrangement of those materials determine the
intrinsic spectral reflectance of Earth’s land surface at the
plot scale. As measured by a spaceborne or airborne sensor, the
apparent reflectance depends on the intrinsic reflectance, the
surface texture, the contribution and attenuation by the atmosphere, and
the topography. Compensation or correction for the topographic effect
requires information in digital elevation models (DEMs). Available DEMs
with global coverage at ~30 m spatial resolution are
derived from interferometric radar and stereo-photogrammetry. Locally or
regionally, airborne lidar altimetry, airborne interferometric radar, or
stereo-photogrammetry from airborne or fine-resolution satellite imagery
produces DEMs with finer spatial resolutions. Characterization of the
quality of DEMs typically expresses the root-mean-square (RMS) error of
the elevation, but the accuracy of remote sensing retrievals is acutely
sensitive to uncertainties in the topographic properties that affect the
illumination geometry. The essential variables are the cosine of the
local illumination angle and the shadows cast by neighboring terrain. We
show that calculations with globally available DEMs underrepresent
shadows and consistently underestimate the values of the cosine of
illumination angle; the RMS error increases with solar zenith angle and
in more rugged terrain. Analyzing imagery of Earth’s mountains from
current and future missions requires addressing the uncertainty
introduced by errors in DEMs on algorithms that estimate surface
properties from retrievals of the apparent spectral reflectance.
Intriguing potential improvements lie in novel methods to gain
information about topography from the imagery itself.