loading page

Quantification of physical soil crust thickness and its effects on runoff and sediment yield
  • +5
  • Xuchao Zhu,
  • Yin Liang,
  • Lili Qu,
  • Longxi Cao,
  • Zhiyuan Tian,
  • Zhenkui Gu,
  • Hongli Guo,
  • Meng Li
Xuchao Zhu
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Yin Liang
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Lili Qu
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Longxi Cao
College of Earth Science, Chengdu University of Technology
Author Profile
Zhiyuan Tian
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Zhenkui Gu
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological sciences
Author Profile
Hongli Guo
Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau of Jiangsu Province
Author Profile
Meng Li
Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau of Jiangsu Province
Author Profile

Abstract

Physical soil crusts will form on most soils during and after rainfall and it has important effects on the runoff and sediment on slopes. However, objective and effective methods for quantifying the characteristics of physical soil crusts (such as the thickness) are not currently available. We used a new method for determining the thickness of physical soil crusts based on X-ray computed tomography (CT) in order to quantify the thickness of the structural crust (SC) and depositional crust (DC) for two typical erosive soils comprising granite red soil (GRS) and Quaternary red clay (QRC) in the red soil region of southern China. The pores in the GRS and QRC were characterized as finely and densely spatially distributed, with an average porosity of 15.47% and a range of 1.66–28.83%. The soil porosity increased rapidly in the 0–3 mm depth, but the porosity of the SC and DC soil samples generally decreased or was stable in the 3–30 mm depth. The average thickness of the soil crust was 1.31 mm, and the average thicknesses of SC and DC were 1.16 and 1.46 mm, respectively. The thickness of SC of GRS decreased with the slope, whereas the thickness of DC of QRC generally increased with the slope. The thickness of SC increased with runoff yield and its contribution rate to the runoff cannot be neglected. The study provides a method for the objective quantification of physical soil crust and can deepen the research on slope erosion process and influencing factors.
May 2022Published in Soil Science Society of America Journal volume 86 issue 3 on pages 630-642. 10.1002/saj2.20396