loading page

Developing a Machine learning Regional watershed model from individual Soil and Water Assessment Tool models for western Lake Erie
  • +5
  • Soomin Chun,
  • Jeffrey Kast,
  • Jay Martin,
  • Jeffrey Bielicki,
  • Margaret Kalcic,
  • Rebecca Muenich,
  • Yu-Chen Wang,
  • Bhavik Bakshi
Soomin Chun
The Ohio State University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jeffrey Kast
The Ohio State University
Author Profile
Jay Martin
The Ohio State University
Author Profile
Jeffrey Bielicki
The Ohio State University
Author Profile
Margaret Kalcic
The Ohio State University
Author Profile
Rebecca Muenich
University of Michigan
Author Profile
Yu-Chen Wang
University of Michigan
Author Profile
Bhavik Bakshi
The Ohio State University
Author Profile

Abstract

Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is one of the widely used hydrological models, especially it has been successfully applied for the assessment of the impact of land use land cover and best management practices scenarios. But it is less applicable for type of research that requires integration or optimization with other models since it cannot update the land-use and best management practice information efficiently and it should be run separately when results for the multiple watersheds are needed. These days, the attention on the water security has been growing and interdisciplinary works desires integration of the hydrological model with other models are being highlighted. Thus, there are needs of development of the surrogate model which is computationally efficient and applicable to multiple watersheds. In this research, we propose the surrogate model of the SWAT with novel machine learning techniques such as random forest model. As a first step, the models are trained with the SWAT data from one watershed, which is a Maumee River Watersheds. Models for flow, mineral phosphorus, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and sediment transport are built separately, and the model performance was above satisfactory level based on R-squared value, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, and percent bias. In addition, the surrogate models were tested for the different best management practices adoption scenarios and were trained additional data to make the model valid for the wide range of the best management practices adoption ratios. Finally, the surrogate models were expanded to multiple watersheds, by training SWAT results from Huron River Watersheds and River Raisin and they evaluated with the R-squared value. High R-squared values indicated that the surrogate model could be used in place of SWAT.