Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

The geologically supervised spectral investigation as a key methodology for identifying volcanically active areas on Venus
  • +4
  • Piero D'Incecco,
  • Justin Filiberto,
  • Iván López,
  • Dmitry Gorinov,
  • Goro Komatsu,
  • Alexey Martynov,
  • Pavel Pisarenko
Piero D'Incecco
Università d'Annunzio

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Justin Filiberto
Lunar and Planetary Institute
Author Profile
Iván López
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos - Campus de Móstoles
Author Profile
Dmitry Gorinov
Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (IKI)
Author Profile
Goro Komatsu
Università d'Annunzio
Author Profile
Alexey Martynov
Scientific and Production Association. S.A. Lavochkin
Author Profile
Pavel Pisarenko
Scientific and Production Association. S.A. Lavochkin
Author Profile

Abstract

Combining geologic mapping and stratigraphic reconstruction of lava flows at Sapas, Maat and Ozza Montes, three potentially young volcanic structures of Atla Regio on Venus, with analysis of the spectral signature (radar emissivity anomalies) characterizing each mapped flow, Brossier et al. (2021) conclude that some of the lava flows at Maat Mons may be geologically recent (~25 Ma). The lava flows of Sapas and Ozza Montes are more consistent with weathered lava flows forming chlorapatite and some perovskite oxides. We discuss the reasons why, besides the importance of the results they obtained, the methodology they used can be very valuable for future investigations with higher resolution datasets. The importance of combining geologic interpretation with spectral analysis in the reconstruction of the volcanic history of Venus Considering its size, gravity and the presence of an atmosphere, Venus is typically considered as the twin sister of the Earth, but despite the apparent similarities with our planet, Venus is notably different because it is characterized by its extreme surface environment. With 90 bars and 475 °C, its surface is a very inhospitable place for life as we know it. Venus does not show evidence for a present plate tectonics-like activity, having a major part of its surface volcanic deposits younger than 300 Ma. It has been hypothesized that Venus underwent a catastrophic event of global resurfacing about 300 Ma ago, which may have almost entirely rejuvenated its surface (Schaber, 1992; Nimmo and McKenzie, 1998; Romeo and Turcotte, 2010; Strom et al., 1994; Turcotte et al., 1999). Some other studies instead favor a more equilibrium resurfacing model of the surface (Phillips et al, 1992; Phillips and Hansen, 1994; Bjonnes et al., 2012; O’Rourke and Korenaga, 2015). It is also possible that the past volcanic history of Venus somehow reflected an intermediate situation between these two end-member scenarios. Related to this topic, there has been a subject of debate whether or not the volcanism on Venus is currently evolving toward an equilibrium stage, with occurrences of smaller and more frequent localized eruptions. In this regard, it is vital to identify areas with current or recent volcanism, to measure the actual rate and volume of the most recent volcanic eruptions. The geologic interpretation and analysis of spectral signatures (both in radar and infrared wavelengths) can help us constraining the age of surface volcanic deposits on Venus. In geology, the so called “cross-cutting interrelationships” can constrain the relative age of two lava flows as it has been applied to young, possibly very recent lava flows and tectonic features on
Jul 2021Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets volume 126 issue 7. 10.1029/2021JE006909