loading page

Mixing Downstream of Stream Confluences Alters Carbon and Nutrient Cycling in Freshwater Networks
  • +1
  • Stephen Plont,
  • Jacob Riney,
  • Caitlin Miller,
  • Erin Hotchkiss
Stephen Plont
Virginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jacob Riney
Virginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences
Author Profile
Caitlin Miller
Virginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences
Author Profile
Erin Hotchkiss
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Author Profile

Abstract

Stream confluences are ubiquitous features in freshwater networks, have distinct hydrogeomorphic characteristics relative to upstream tributaries and downstream reaches, and serve as junctions of previously independent streams. Confluences may enhance or disrupt biological processes. How ecosystem functions (e.g., carbon metabolism, nutrient removal) change at confluences remains a knowledge gap in our understanding of the processes controlling water quality at the network-scale. To test how carbon and nutrient cycling may differ between confluences and their tributaries, we estimated dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and PO43- uptake in October 2018 and July 2019 in two tributary reaches as well as downstream of their confluence mixing zone using pulse injections of roasted barley leachate (a standardized, colored DOC source), K2HPO4, and NaCl (a non-bioreactive tracer). We hypothesized that biological processes would be enhanced at confluences due to the delivery and mixing of different microbial communities and/or carbon and nutrient sources. We calculated PO43- and DOC uptake velocities (vf-PO4, vf-DOC) and compared them across sites and season. In October 2018, vf-PO4 in each tributary was 10.2 and 4.9 mm/min while vf-DOC was 0.84 and 0.38 mm/min. vf-PO4 downstream (6.6 mm/min) was lower than vf-PO4 predicted from a mixing model of upstream vf-PO4 and proportional flow contributions of tributaries (10.1 mm/min), suggesting in-stream PO43- uptake was suppressed as a result of confluence mixing. Conversely, vf-DOC downstream (0.94 mm/min) was higher than vf-DOC predicted from a mixing model (0.75 mm/min). This difference in measured and predicted vf-DOC was supported by bioassay experiments, which found enhanced DOC uptake downstream of the mixing zone. DOC uptake within the confluence mixing zone was spatially heterogeneous (0.00 to 0.19 day-1) and varied more within mixing zone transects than among the two tributary reaches. Ongoing analyses are comparing uptake estimates among seasons. Our results suggest that DOC and PO43- uptake at confluences cannot be estimated from tributary DOC and PO43- uptake alone. A critical next step in this work is to identify the mechanisms behind confluence-derived changes in carbon metabolism and nutrient removal across freshwater networks.