loading page

Evolution of coseismic and post-seismic landsliding after the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal
  • +6
  • Mark Kincey,
  • Nick Rosser,
  • Tom R Robinson,
  • Alexander Densmore,
  • Ram Shrestha,
  • Dammar Singh Pujara,
  • Katie J Oven,
  • Jack G Williams,
  • Zuzanna M Swirad
Mark Kincey
Durham University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Nick Rosser
Durham University
Author Profile
Tom R Robinson
Newcastle University
Author Profile
Alexander Densmore
Durham University
Author Profile
Ram Shrestha
National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal
Author Profile
Dammar Singh Pujara
National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal
Author Profile
Katie J Oven
Northumbria University
Author Profile
Jack G Williams
Durham University
Author Profile
Zuzanna M Swirad
Durham University
Author Profile

Abstract

Coseismic landslides are a major hazard associated with large earthquakes in mountainous regions. Despite growing evidence for their widespread impacts and persistence, current understanding of the evolution of landsliding over time after large earthquakes, the hazard that these landslides pose, and their role in the mountain sediment cascade remains limited. To address this, we present the first systematic multi-temporal landslide inventory to span the full rupture area of a large continental earthquake across the pre-, co-and post-seismic periods. We focus on the 3.5 years since the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal and show that throughout this period both the number and area of mapped landslides have remained higher than on the day of the earthquake itself. We document systematic upslope and northward shifts in the density of landsliding through time. Areas where landslides have persisted tend to cluster in space, but those areas that have returned to pre-earthquake conditions are more dispersed. Whilst both pre-and coseismic landslide locations tend to experience persistent post-earthquake landsliding, a wider population of newly activated but spatially-dispersed landslides has developed after the earthquake. This is particularly important for post-earthquake recovery plans that are typically based on hazard assessments conducted immediately post-earthquake and thus do not consider the evolving landslide hazard. We show that recovery back to pre-earthquake landsliding rates is fundamentally dependent on how that recovery is defined and measured. Clarity around this definition is particularly important for informing a comprehensive and precautionary approach to post-earthquake landslide hazard and risk.