loading page

Impacts of tiled land cover characterization in the Model for Prediction Across Scales-Atmosphere (MPAS-A)
  • +2
  • Patrick Campbell,
  • Jesse Owen Bash,
  • Jerold A. Herwehe,
  • Robert Chad Gilliam,
  • Dan Li
Patrick Campbell
George Mason University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jesse Owen Bash
U.S. EPA
Author Profile
Jerold A. Herwehe
U.S. EPA
Author Profile
Robert Chad Gilliam
US EPA
Author Profile
Dan Li
Boston University
Author Profile

Abstract

Parameterization of subgrid-scale variability of land cover characterization (LCC) is an active area of research, and can improve model performance compared to the dominant (i.e., most abundant tile) approach. The “Noah” land surface model implementation in the global Model for Predictions Across Scales-Atmosphere (MPAS-A), however, only uses the dominant LCC approach that leads to oversimplification in regions of highly heterogeneous LCC (e.g., urban/suburban settings). Thus, in this work we implement a subgrid tiled approach as an option in MPAS-A, version 6.0, and assess the impacts of tiled LCC on meteorological predictions for two gradually refining meshes (92-25 and 46-12 km) focused on the conterminous U.S for January and July 2016. Compared to the dominant approach, results show that using the tiled LCC leads to pronounced global changes in 2-m temperature (July global average change ~ -0.4 K), 2-m moisture, and 10-m wind speed for the 92-25 km mesh. The tiled LCC reduces mean biases in 2-m temperature (July U.S. average bias reduction ~ factor of 4) and specific humidity in the central and western U.S. for the 92-25 km mesh, improves the agreement of vertical profiles (e.g., temperature, humidity, and wind speed) with observed radiosondes, and there is a general decrease in error for precipitation in the U.S.; however, there is increased bias and error for incoming solar radiation at the surface. The inclusion of subgrid LCC has implications for reducing systematic warm biases found in numerical weather prediction models.
16 Aug 2020Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres volume 125 issue 15. 10.1029/2019JD032093